If It Were Me, I’d Do What Obama Is Doing

The Fiscal Cliff/Sequestration contains tax increases and defense cuts. This is a big spending Democrat’s dream.

A cunning legerdemain is in the works, and, if it were me, I’d follow and do what Obama is doing. Think about the Fiscal Cliff/Sequestration for a moment. Faultless tax increases and faultless spending cuts, and, more importantly, among those spending cuts are juicy, delicious defense cuts. This is a big spending Democrat’s wet dream.

If you don’t believe me, ask Howard Dean, who said that the Fiscal Cliff:

“…is actually the best deal progressive Democrats are going to get. And here’s why. One, we get the Clinton tax rates on everybody. Will it cause a problem? Yes. There will be a short recession, and it will be painful. But two, we get defense cuts. Republicans are never going to agree to that. And three, there are some human services cuts, which we’re not going to like. But it’s the least possible damage.”

So, if I was a big spender turned on by the sloppy inefficiencies of big government, why the heck would I not want to go over the cliff? And does anyone deny that Kaptain O is a big spender? The guy has racked up over $6 trillion in debt in one term and is on track to rack up more debt than all the other presidents combined. What’s even more impressive is that he has nothing to show for it! Try to do that if you’re fiscally prudent. You can’t. It can’t be done unless you’re awash in other people’s money and blow through it like a Secret Service agent blowing through a line of cocaine off a hooker’s belly.  So, if I were a Obama, I’d do what I could to guarantee we careen well over the cliff and land somewhere well beyond the slope–pull a Thelma and Louise and jettison 80 mph into the canyon.

But there’s a catch. I don’t want to get blamed when things hit the fan (note the little recession bit Howard mentioned above), so I can’t look like this is what I want. The trick will be twofold. First, maintain that it’s the other side’s fault so they’ll get the blame, even if you know I want the cliff more than Michael Moore wants another box of Cracker Jacks. Second, when negotiating with the other side, be sure to make demands so ridiculously over the top that there’s no way the other side will agree to it. Then the negotiations will fail, there won’t be an agreement, and the cliff will pass under us as we hurdle ourselves into the soft fluffiness of other people’s cash. (As I’m writing this, it occurs to me that life would be so much easier if I was a Lefty. You just need to get other people’s money to pay for things you want, so you don’t have to. And right now, that seems really easy. I mean there’s a woman, Sandra Fluke, who stands to make about $160,000 a year to start once she graduates from a private, elite university that’s demanding we pay for her $15/month birth control! Sheesh, if she can get away with that, I should be able to get cash from you for doing nothing!)

Accomplishing the first one is easy. Just state you’re for tax cuts on the middle class while defining the other side’s “tax cuts for all” as “tax cuts for the rich”. And just keep saying it over and over again. The parrots in the press will unquestioningly pick it up and work it into a meme for you. The dullards will believe it, won’t ask questions, and will unwittingly agree to hand over more of their money to you and blame the other side. No problem. Try to not talk about any spending cuts whatsoever, but if you must, when asked about cuts, a curt “yeah, they’re on the table, we all know that” (even though they’re really not) will suffice to placate the press .

The second one is also not that hard.  When the other side meets your tax increases, pull a Lucy and increase them by a substantial percentage. Heck, maybe even double them. Ask for $800 billion, they agree, reply with, “oh, I mean $1.6 trillion”. For good measure, include a demand that requires the other side to surrender one or two of their Constitutional responsibilities to you. Pick one. The “power of the purse” is a good one. You’ll hit them right in the mind with that. There’s no way they’ll agree to it. You’re asking them to immolate themselves. They will not, and they’ll look even more inflexible when they’re ineptly hemming and hawing in the media about the absurdity of the proposition, meanwhile the doe-eyed commentators will express confusion by their resistance to such a reasonable “compromise”.

If you do all of the above with a smile, a strut, and a Hawaiian vacation or two, you’ll look cool, in control, and flexible. You’ll be sure to get what you want, and the other side will get the blame. Perfect.

You've just read "If It Were Me, I’d Do What Obama Is Doing" by Scott Morales originally posted at GraniteGrok.com (Home).

This post is contributed by a community member. The views expressed in this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Patch Media Corporation. Everyone is welcome to submit a post to Patch. If you'd like to post a blog, go here to get started.

Scott Morales December 14, 2012 at 01:44 AM
Re: Ray's "you are correct, you don't have to..." sentence. Wow! That's the most fantastic exemplar of self-contradiction I have ever seen, and two in one sentence no less. Bravo, Ray, your comments have breached the parodic threshold. Let's take it apart and marvel at its disorder. The First one: If I'm correct, as Ray states, that assertions and propositions are not interchangeable or synonyms, why then does Ray use propositions and assertions as synonyms in the very same sentence where Ray says I'm correct in stating that they are not synonyms? lol. Who knows! The second one is strikingly better: If my opinion is "...in damp places where people never go", why is Ray writing this exact line pertaining to my opinion in one of those places where I post my opinion regularly? Ray clearly goes to that place because he's writing this line and other comments in that place. Lol. Cue the carnival music. Given the blaring calliope, I won't quibble with your observation about "when one does not have a handle on reality", that's like debating Michael Moore on the visceral joys of overeating, he clearly has a more experiential perspective on it than I, as do you with not having a handle on reality.
Scott Morales December 14, 2012 at 01:46 AM
Ray, re: "by the way" Oy vey, you uncorked more desultory pettifoggery. I didn't bring up Reagan, I didn't write the study, this isn't in the 1980's. Any honest reading will reveal you writing to yourself. Your strawman is just that, and your parodic inanities have expired my interest.
Ray Guarino December 15, 2012 at 02:07 PM
Scott, nothing but distraction over the difference between "assertion" and "proposition", and it doesn't hide the fact that your opinion is based on magical thinking, and not on anything substantial that you can back up. You haven't showed that sequestration proves Obama or Democrats as "big spenders". The basis of your argument has its origins in your imagination, and is not grounded in reality as you readily admit here: "I think they'll use the cash "saved" on some spending and acquired via tax hikes as a slush fund for their cronies." Therefore, your essay is worthless, with nothing to back it up. Then you throw out this right wing George Mason report that confuses paid for entitlements, such as Social Security, as part of the deficit and national debt. Ronald Reagan once siad that this is wrong minded, but you dismiss that relevant fact because it doesn't fit your fantasy world view. "And yet you can't help but read it!" you responded, yes Scott, I read it, I also accidently stepped in dog mess, but that doesn't make the dog an artist.
Seamus Carty December 17, 2012 at 05:31 AM
Yes. Let's have government spending as a % of GNP be the same as in the 1990's....
Seamus Carty December 17, 2012 at 05:33 AM
Sending the real estate market and the construction industry down the tubes....


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something