Anti-Casino Group Tells Residents to Ask Hassan the 'Tough Questions'

The governor will appear on a radio talk show this Friday.

With Gov. Maggie Hassan scheduled to appear on New Hampshire Public Radio's "The Exchange" this Friday, residents are being asked by an anti-casino advocacy group to call in and stress the problems with expanded gambling.

Granite State Coalition Against Expanded Gambling Chairman Jim Rubens sent out a message on Wednesday detailing what the group sees as issues with the expanded gambling legislation – Senate Bill 152.

The bill, which has previously been backed by Hassan on multiple occasions, calls for one casino license in the state.

According to the GSCAEG, the bill doesn't have any limit set for casino expansion, and SB152 even includes a commission to plan beyond one casino.

"How will the Governor assure that casinos and tacky slots barns do not spread statewide?" asked Rubens in the message. "This has happened in every other state to have allowed casinos."

Another problem addressed by the GSCAEG is possible litigation by losing bidders should an $80 million "monopoly casino license" be awarded, which the group says could delay funding for the proposed state budget.

"Now it's crystal clear that including casino license money will result in a seriously unbalanced state budget," said Rubens. "And no community will be insulated from the broken families, crime, and small business cannibalization caused by casinos."

During a Senate Ways & Means Committee hearing on Feb. 19, Hassan voiced a sense of urgency with Massachusetts set to award three casino bids out of a pool of 11 suitors.

"Across New Hampshire our citizens have made it clear that a high-end casino is their preferred way to increase state support for our priorities," she said last week.

"We can no longer pretend that gambling isn't coming to our communities," Hassan added. "It is already here."

Hassan will appear on "The Exchange" from 9 a.m. to 10 a.m. Those wishing to speak with the governor are asked to call in by 9:08 a.m. at 1-800-892-6477.

Sean O'Keeffe February 28, 2013 at 12:18 PM
On the surface it appears that the most positive reason for installing casinos is the revenue they generate. I think it's the fact that we need the casinos because we're desperate for that revenue that bothers me most. State and federal budgets are in the red due to the abuse of entitlement programs. This is seen as a miricle fix to those budget deficits. It's a lazy solution that won't work. it's just another form of taxation. The revenue generated by these casinos will be squandered. It simply buys politicians time so they don't have to deal with the real issue, over-spending. Families where the bread winner has a gambling compulsion will likely suffer. The state becomes partners with the house and always remember; THE HOUSE NEVER LOSES!
Ugh February 28, 2013 at 12:28 PM
City of Nashua sponsoring trips to Foxwoods. http://nashua.patch.com/announcements/city-sponsored-foxwoods-and-nyc-trips-book-now
More than 50 years in NH February 28, 2013 at 02:38 PM
Isnt this Rubens fella a has been politician from the last century.
Jim Rubens February 28, 2013 at 11:24 PM
Hi folks: Knock the messenger when the message is strong. Check out the NH Center for Public Policy Studies report released today showing a net $2 million loss per year to the state of NH from a Salem casino as proposed. http://archive.constantcontact.com/fs120/1102570285171/archive/1112613458009.html
Reggie March 01, 2013 at 11:25 AM
Rubens should consider staying within the realm of global warming. But those studies are just as accurate as the one NHCPPS is floating around.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something