Granite State Progress Statement on New Hampshire voters overwhelmingly supporting background checks, assault weapons ban
Henniker, NH -- A new poll released by New England College confirms that New Hampshire voters overwhelming support stronger gun violence prevention measures.
By a nearly 3-to-1 margin, Granite Staters support a ban on assault weapons in New Hampshire (72%-24%) and by a nearly 8-to-1 margin support a national proposal to require a criminal background check for every gun sale (88%-10%). Both men (64% to 34%) and women (80% to 16%) strongly support the mass murder prevention initiative – otherwise known as the assault weapons ban. The poll reports a margin of error of 3.82%.
“The horrific tragedy that we saw in Connecticut has increased the public call for urgent action to prevent more gun violence,” said Granite State Progress executive director Zandra Rice Hawkins. “This poll demonstrates that the people of New Hampshire share the same sense of outrage that communities across the country have expressed in recent weeks. This should serve as notice to both the State House in Concord and our elected representatives in Washington that Granite Staters are serious about preventing gun violence. The consensus that the poll shows cuts across party, region, and gender.”
PR: New England College Poll Shows Overwhelming Support for Tougher Laws
###
Granite State Progress is a progressive advocacy organization that addresses issues of immediate state and local concern. Granite State Progress works as a communications hub for the progressive community to provide a strong, credible voice in advancing progressive solutions to critical community problems. Press releases and other information available online at GraniteStateProgress.org.
Atlant Schmidt
7:19 am on Friday, January 25, 2013
But the loudmouths, well, their beliefs are "different".
steve forte
7:50 am on Friday, January 25, 2013
How do you plan to enforce background checks on all gun sales?
Really??
8:26 am on Friday, January 25, 2013
You require background checks on the 40% of gun sales that don't require them now.
Any more questions.
steve forte
7:50 am on Friday, January 25, 2013
When you can enforce background checks on all reefer sales , let me know.
No Longer interested
8:44 am on Friday, January 25, 2013
No law works perfectly, but that is not a good reason not to have any laws. The American people respect the rule of law, not of tyrants.
steve forte
8:43 am on Friday, January 25, 2013
Really??
8:26 am on Friday, January 25, 2013
You require background checks on the 40% of gun sales that don't require them now.
Any more questions.
Where ya coming up with the 40% number? I have never purchased a gun without a background check. If I had , no one would know so Im assuming that 40% is just a guess.
Really??
9:01 am on Friday, January 25, 2013
I don't know if you know this steve, but reality includes much more than just your personal experience.
Attached is a explainer of the 40% number, an interesting part of this link is that the NRA has gotten legislation part that prohibits the government from collecting this data today. Imagine that, the NRA actively working to keep American safe.....
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2012/jul/25/michael-bloomberg/mayor-michael-bloomberg-says-40-percent-guns-are-s/
steve forte
8:45 am on Friday, January 25, 2013
Ray Guarino
8:44 am on Friday, January 25, 2013
No law works perfectly, but that is not a good reason not to have any laws. The American people respect the rule of law, not of tyrants.
Laws only protect you from sane non criminals. Are you in fear of sane non crim inals Ray?
Really??
9:04 am on Friday, January 25, 2013
All shooters are sane non criminals and protected by the NRA right up until they shoot someone. Even then, they have to shoot someone who the NRA deems "didn't deserve it".
No Longer interested
12:52 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013
Wrong again Steve,
laws protect us from all, the sane and the insane.
steve forte
9:04 am on Friday, January 25, 2013
Mayor Michael Bloomberg says
Thats your proof? Your kidding right?
Well he also says "
"We don't need more laws."
Do you agreed with him there too ? That is from your link.
Really??
9:06 am on Friday, January 25, 2013
Mayor Bloomberg, Politifact, AND the data is my proof.
And no, I am not kidding.
Do you realize how desperate you sound when you can't even accept the basic facts?
steve forte
9:09 am on Friday, January 25, 2013
Mike bloomberg says. is not fact. Go ahead and require background checks. Not something I oppose. Would have absolutly no effect on me. Thats the kind of legislation I can support. I just think ya barking up the wrong tree for the simple fact that out of that " 40%" more then 1/2 are illegal sales that will continue.
Really??
9:12 am on Friday, January 25, 2013
All guns started in legal hands, why do criminals have them now?
Because legal gun owners didn't do their duty and secure their weapons, or sold them to criminals without doing a background check.
steve forte
9:13 am on Friday, January 25, 2013
Whats to keep someone from legaly buying guns , waiting 32 days and then selling them ?
steve forte
9:14 am on Friday, January 25, 2013
Really??
9:04 am on Friday, January 25, 2013
All shooters are sane non criminals and protected by the NRA right up until they shoot someone. Even then, they have to shoot someone who the NRA deems "didn't deserve it".
Try again.
Studies conducted at both the local and national level indicate the overwhelming majority of murders are committed by people with previous criminal records. Even a significant percentage of homicide victims themselves have criminal records.
http://www.guncite.com/gun_control_gcgvmurd.html
Really??
5:29 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013
Your quoting "gincite.com", the Michel Bloomberg of the right?
steve forte
9:17 am on Friday, January 25, 2013
Really??
9:12 am on Friday, January 25, 2013
All guns started in legal hands, why do criminals have them now?
Because legal gun owners didn't do their duty and secure their weapons, or sold them to criminals without doing a background check.
Then increase penalties for that.
Patriot
9:28 am on Friday, January 25, 2013
So much to say about nothing!
Bottom line some like and want guns others do not. I honestly believe you will never make a reasonable argument that will convince the opposition.
Anyone that can believe in smaller size drinks will curb obesity is an idiot. The same applies to more regulation of guns.
As long as we want to do something it will happen. In America you can be what you want to be. But continue the debate I have time for a good laugh.
Really??
5:30 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013
Sounding like a socialist there steve.
Stephen B. Bernier
9:39 am on Friday, January 25, 2013
I just conducted my own "poll" which shows the NEC poll to be a slanted, biased, crock of crap. Where was it conducted, Harvard University? Come on now!
Really??
5:31 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013
I'm sure you've taken plenty of polls in your life.
steve forte
9:44 am on Friday, January 25, 2013
Did your poll include 656 people as in the poll above?
Patriot
1:37 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013
Try registered voters that own a gun! For those that don't it is easy to give up things of others.
I remember how open college students where about giving up tax money, then, they asked those same students to share their grade point average with students that had low grade point averages and did they turn selfish.
Stephen B. Bernier
9:53 am on Friday, January 25, 2013
Thats a pretty small number of people to come to the conclusion that the "majority of NH voters" agree. HELLO, MCFLY?
Steve From NH
11:28 am on Friday, January 25, 2013
No, that's how polls work. Seems to work pretty well too, if you remember how well the last election results were predicted.
steve forte
10:00 am on Friday, January 25, 2013
Keep in mind anyone can do a poll and if you tell them what you want the results to be beforehand they can accomplish that task.
Stephen B. Bernier
10:08 am on Friday, January 25, 2013
I agree, that's why I took the liberty to conduct my own poll. I asked 3 people and two disagreed with the findings in the NEC poll. That's a majority where I come from, so the way I see it, NEC is incorrect!
Robert Sprague
11:59 am on Friday, January 25, 2013
Maybe you need to hang out with a different crowd!
steve forte
10:17 am on Friday, January 25, 2013
" do you beleive guns should be outlawed so that dangerous criminals will no longer be a threat to your family"
or
" do you beleive guns should be outlawed and you can no longer protect your family from dangerous criminals"
Realy the same question. Im sure the results would be different.
Stephen B. Bernier
11:00 am on Friday, January 25, 2013
Of course they would, try convincing an anti, though. Once again, if you pretend, anything can be real!
Robert Sprague
11:55 am on Friday, January 25, 2013
If only Lincoln had a gun with him
Coulda shot Booth between the eyes,
Blown the smoke away from the rim,
Said a one-liner and bowed,
A standing ovation from the crowd,
Just think how freakin cool that woulda been ooh…
If only Gandhi had a Smith & Wesson
Said “Screw passive resistance”
And taught his enemies a real lesson,
Could’ve inspired fear and dread,
And his assassins woulda fled
Just think of all the things that could be undone
If only everyone had a gun
If John Lennon had a derringer, think what coulda been,
Coulda shot Chapman in the torso
And waited for gangrene to set in,
And his advice to all his fans,
Would be, “Give a piece a chance”,
Imagine all the people living as one,
If only everyone had a gun
I’m talking everyone form the smallest child
To the oldest and most senile
Now that’s a recipe for a safer nation
Jesse James and Wild Bill
Would be pretty old, but living still,
If they’d just heeded the NRA’s recommendation
All the problems of the world can be solved by a gun,
If your gun ain’t solved no problems,
Boy you just need a bigger one,
Guns can help an awful lot,
Just the wrong people keep getting shot,
But they’re incredibly safe and not to mention fun ooh,
Just think if Jesus Christ had had a gun
Coulda shot the Pharisees till they believed
He was God’s only son,
No need for him to have died,
If God had a gun on his right hand side,
It’s the only saviour the NRA wants,
Glory be to guns
Jan Schmidt
5:29 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013
Of only Reagan had been surrounded by men with guns, with the single job of protecting him.
Oh wait... He was!
Stephen B. Bernier
12:19 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013
Very witty Mr. Sprague, now we all know you can write a song. Problem is, you describe some twisted thoughts and acts of violence that don't match the characteristics of the people in it. Another lame attempt to portray freedom loving people as homicidal maniacs. You lose any credibility you might otherwise have had when you try to defame millions of people by these tactics. Don't hold your breath for a grammy!
Stephen B. Bernier
12:36 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013
And Yes, maybe President Lincoln COULD have shot Booth (the asassin) between the eyes, would that have been a BAD thing? Point is, people like you, who would choose to cower and beg for your life rather than stand and defend yourself or your Family, have absolutely no right to force your policies down ANYONE elses throats.
Steve From NH
12:56 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013
>people like you, who would choose to cower and beg for your life rather than stand and defend yourself or your Family
That's a disgraceful and cowardly comment. Not to mention ignorant, stupid, completely disrespectful, most likely a lie.
Do you think you can things like that just because you have a gun? Hopefully you just hit the Enter key prematurely, I'd suggest you maybe consider a self-imposed waiting period before you commit words like that to public.
Robert Sprague
12:59 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013
Stephan: You may be the most boring, inarticulate writer I have ever encountered in my life. The folks here at the office in in histerics laughing at you and your attempts at logic and reason. One thing I never do is cower or beg...I just need lots of weapons like you do. You are a sad sack. Oh, my goodness, people here are falling over laughing at your nonsense...
Stephen B. Bernier
1:26 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013
Steve from NH, you don't have to like what I say, but that won't stop me from expressing my opinion. I am curious as to why you think I need a "self imposed waiting period" before telling you something you don't like to hear? Please explain.
Steve From NH
2:52 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013
Just a suggestion that you count to 10 before you say and do things that you might regret, that's all. Trying to be helpful. Expressing support for Robert Sprague.
Really, really don't care what you say or what your opinion is. I bet you hear that a lot.
Stephen B. Bernier
1:35 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013
Mr. Sprague, check your spelling and grammar before you press submit. And why do I care about the "folks here at the office"?, I was not addressing them. Have the courage of your own convictions and stand on your own. And why do you assume I have "lots of guns"?
Robert Sprague
1:37 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013
Stevie Bernier, my boy, you have every right to your opinion. But you are a name-caller. Folks don't like that. They think you are a low-rent fellow. Spend some time rereading the obnoxious ways that you put things. Edit yourself. Show some maturity. Do you have any maturity? You will never convince anyone to change his mind about important issues if you behave this way. Learn. Grow. Be a real man. That's what I believe Steve from NH was trying - politely - to explain to you. PATCH is a place where adults discuss issues. It's not for immature people. Be your best self, my friend.
Stephen B. Bernier
1:42 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013
Okay Bobby, I understand, you're mad cause I don't like your song, or your rhetoric.
Joe
1:43 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013
“Walk softly and carry a big stick, you shall go far” — Teddy Roosevelt
Does not taking away the "big stick" from those who "walk softly" limit their ability to "go far" or was Teddy just blowing smoke? And what happens when those who "walk softly" no longer carry a "big stick"; but, those who "walk violently" are the only ones carrying a "big stick"?
Robert Sprague
1:53 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013
No, Stephen Bernier, I was hoping you could learn how to debate like an adult. I was hoping you might "person-up". State your issues, tell us your thoughtful opinion. Stop being a little child. Be a big boy, instead of the fool you seem so anxious to play. No one will listen to you unless you express yourself maturely. Open your eyes, my friend.
Stephen B. Bernier
2:16 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013
Scroll back through the comments Mr. Sprague, you are the bomb tosser here, you are one of those people who want to hear one side, YOUR OWN.
Robert Sprague
2:20 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013
Goodbye, Steve...
Stephen B. Bernier
2:35 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013
EXACTLY!
Steve From NH
2:54 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013
Interesting article:
http://www.cnn.com/2013/01/25/opinion/davis-gun-control-logic/index.html?hpt=hp_t4
Robert Sprague
4:56 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013
Why require the use of seat belts if wearing a seat belt does not always save a life in an accident? Why prohibit people from carrying guns onto planes if it doesn't eliminate all risk of hijacking? Why prohibit providing assistance to terrorists if it doesn't stop all terrorist acts? Why require tests for the issuance of driver's licenses if it doesn't stop all accidents?
We require these regulations because they address problems that need to be addressed and because if these regulations can save some lives, they are steps worth taking. So it should be with the gun debate.
No proposal, or set of proposals, will ever stop all gun crime. But the 1978 proposals could have stopped some illegal sales of guns by renegade dealers. And things like forced waiting periods for gun purchases, requiring background checks for firearms buyers at gun shows and a ban on assault weapons would certainly save some lives.
Maybe it is thousands of lives over time; maybe it is hundreds. But isn't every life saved worth it? Would it not have been worth it if even some of the lives lost at Sandy Hook could have been saved because the shooter did not have an assault weapon?
Gun control is not the total answer to the problem of mass shootings, but it plainly needs to be part of any meaningful response. Let's hope that this time the debate on gun control will be a more sensible one.
Really??
5:34 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013
About the time that Daddy left to fight the big war
I saw my first pistol in the general store
In the general store, when I was thirteen
Thought it was the finest thing I ever had seen
So l asked if I could have one someday when I grew up
Mama dropped a dozen eggs, she really blew up
She really blew up and I didn't understand
Mama said the pistol is the devil's right hand
The devil's right hand, the devil's right hand
Mama said the pistol is the devil's right hand
My very first pistol was a cap and ball Colt
Shoot as fast as lightnin' but it loads a might slow
Loads a might slow and soon I found out
It can get you into trouble but it can't get you out
So then I went and bought myself a Colt 45
Called a peacemaker but I never knew why
Never knew why, I didn't understand
Cause Mama said the pistol is the devil's right hand
Well I get into a card game in a company town
Caught a miner cheating I shot the dog down
Shot the dog down, watched the man fall
Never touched his holster, never had a chance to draw
The trial was in the morning and they drug me out of bed
Asked me how I pleaded, not guilty I said
Not guilty I said, you've got the wrong man
Nothing touched the trigger but the devil's right hand
Steve Earle
Robert Sprague
6:04 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013
So, what is confusing about this to "dimwit demcRATS". You hopeless fool, News Flash. There is violence in our world. The Nashua woman's violence. Your verbal violence. Get some therapy. You are an out of control, hapless, inarticulate, moron.
Stephen B. Bernier
7:30 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013
You are without a doubt, a first class jackass, Sprague! You and "the folks at the office" might find your venom entertaining and cute, but with each new rebuttal, in which you insult those who disagree with you, you make it more clear that you are closed minded and incapable of presenting any real arguement. What happened to being mature and speaking as an adult. You too are entitled to your own opinion, but you should practice what you preach, sir!
Proud Conservative
8:19 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013
Sprague - why don't you shut the computer down now and come back here after you've taken your meds. Hurling insults at nearly everyone who posts a comment certainly is backfiring in your face. You see, I, along with others here, feel you're being unnecessarily antagonistic to other posters because you've got a few neutrons firing at the wrong time. That's what your meds are for. They help things up there work the way they should. Now, instead of acting like an equine's rectum (I think you can figure that one out) how about showing us you're a big boy and taking those meds? You'll feel a lot better. And our opinion of you just might improve a bit.
Robert Sprague
8:28 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013
Stephen and "Proud Conservative": You folks have some strange and dangerous things going on. You are gun nuts. Someday our country will be in a position to take your guns away from you. We will then be a safer place.
You guys scare us, out there without tenders. My wife thinks we should hide from you. Maybe she is right.
Proud Conservative
9:09 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013
Gee, maybe you should hide Spragaroo. What if we formed a posse and started rounding up anti-gun nuts? You know, the weirdos who want to do away with the second amendment and confiscate all guns in the name of something or other....the dumbasses who have no clue what they're talking about but are terrified of big words and phrases like "flash suppressor" and "barrel shroud"... the folks who think that criminals will dutifully line up at the corner police station and happily turn in their guns. People like you, Sprague. People who don't have the God-given common sense they were born with, but who live in a self-created fantasy world embellished with the facts they create to keep their fantasy chugging along. Try reality for a change, Sprague. You just might realize it reflects the world around you much more accurately than the imaginary bubble you live in.
Ricardo Bauer
8:51 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013
You have to remind yourself that this is just a blog. There are no requirements to be truthful or honest in a blog. The contents are usually utter trash and should be given no credibility. The blogger is usually egotistical megalomaniacs who have room for only their own opinion.
Better to reply with "BS" (blog s**t) and pass it by than to try to argue with either the blogger or their minions.
So, for this blog.......BS.
Stephen B. Bernier
8:54 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013
Mr. Sprague, tell your Wife she has nothing to fear, disagreeing with someone does not mean you intend to do them any harm. Having said that, I would like to thank you on behalf of every freedom loving, law abiding, American for reaffirming the fact that the REAL agenda here is registration followed by confiscation. If you are under the impression that Big Brother is going to take care of you and your loved ones, think again! And just to clarify, I do not own a sigle firearm, so wrong again, no "gun nut"here!
ForThePeople
9:57 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013
It doesn't sound plausible that some of the weapons are getting more advanced than the minds of the people owning them?
Proud Conservative
8:57 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013
Sprague - did I say I own any guns? Well, to put your mind in a complete tither, I do. And anyone breaking into my place will most assuredly leave in a body bag if I happen to be there.......... which I am most of the time.. If not, the cameras will nail them. You see, I don't like criminals.....not one bit. I'm the guy who believes that the war on drugs could be won in a heartbeat if we doled out the death penalty for anyone dealing or possessing with intent to sell and life behind bars for anyone convicted of using.
ForThePeople
9:53 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013
I don't suppose you have read the novels, but Gollum is a great avatar for you.
I'm concerned about folks whose eyes roll back into their heads at the thought of "shooting the bad guys." You unwittingly make the case for gun-control with your foolish, ignorant comments.
Robert Sprague
9:11 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013
That's a real moderate and considered opinion, Pround Conservative. You are a total and complete whack job!
Proud Conservative
10:08 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013
That's just about the response I'd expect from a liberal. Rest easy tonight because if someone should break into your place you can hurl the alarm clock at them and I'm sure they'll run off with their tail between their legs.
steve forte
6:54 am on Saturday, January 26, 2013
Ray Guarino
12:52 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013
Wrong again Steve,
laws protect us from all, the sane and the insane.
Worked real well in CT huh Ray? Laws will not protect you from the insane who are allowed to walk the streets.
steve forte
6:55 am on Saturday, January 26, 2013
Really??
5:30 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013
Sounding like a socialist there steve.
.
Funny ya keep saying that yet you vote for folks who want to control your life.
Really??
9:18 am on Saturday, January 26, 2013
I never voted for you and you want to control my life.
steve forte
6:57 am on Saturday, January 26, 2013
Jan Schmidt
5:29 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013
Of only Reagan had been surrounded by men with guns, with the single job of protecting him.
Oh wait... He was!
Yes , good thing Kimberly Cates didnt have a gun too right?
Really??
12:12 pm on Saturday, January 26, 2013
You want to suggest that if those morons found a gun in the Cates house the outcome would have been better?
That is well thought out position.....
steve forte
9:42 am on Saturday, January 26, 2013
Really??
9:18 am on Saturday, January 26, 2013
I never voted for you and you want to control my life
I dont want to control your life or anyone elses. You can marry any dude you want. Dosnt effect me one bit.
Really??
12:10 pm on Saturday, January 26, 2013
steve the homophobe
so many thing to fear in your little world....
Robert Sprague
9:47 am on Saturday, January 26, 2013
Read an interesting article about the average IQ of gun-owners vs. non-gun-owners. Anyone care the guess the results?
Really??
12:14 pm on Saturday, January 26, 2013
Of course the idea that it was an "article" and not an actual "study" leads me to believe that it could have said anything.
Proud Conservative
7:11 pm on Saturday, January 26, 2013
Actually, we'd like you to post a link so we can read it ourselves.
Stephen B. Bernier
10:38 am on Saturday, January 26, 2013
This thread is clearly intended to be a forum for like minded, anti gun liberals, who claim to be open minded adults, yet they resort to finger pointing and insults when they don't hear what they want to hear. My advice to anyone on the "wrong side " of this "debate" would be to avoid it altogether, at least avoid this particular group. That way, you can move on to a more fair and balanced forum, elsewhere and these people can continue gladhanding and making each other feel good!
Robert Sprague
10:40 am on Saturday, January 26, 2013
Great idea...