patching...
Breaking: Salem District Court, Parts of Salem High School Remain Without Water After Main Break »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!
Local Voices

Let's Complete The Job By Approving PHASE 2 on March 12

   It's been heartening the past few weeks to see and read all the tremendous support that the much-needed renovation project of our Salem schools has with many of our local residents. The current proposal is PHASE 2 of the Facilities Master Plan, and encompasses the Soule, Fisk and Haigh kindergarten/elementary schools, which were not covered by last year's PHASE 1 ameliorations that corrected deficiencies in the Barron, Lancaster and North Salem schools. Residents have an important opportunity and even responsibility on Tuesday, March 12 to approve these long-overdue ameliorations, which will be Articles Two and Three on your ballots.

   A piece of excellent news arrived on Monday with the announcement that the Salem school system will receive a total of $750,000 of state aid from Concord to be applied for these improvements if the proposal is voted in on March 12. This is an extremely welcome development and points up one of new governor Maggie Hassan's foremost promises during last year's gubernatorial campaign to make New Hampshire's students, at all levels, one of her priorities as governor. This grant will reduce town costs and help ensure that the September completion timeline for the work on the three schools will be met. 

   Salem parents and their school-age children can thank the citizen's group Strengthen Our Schools (SOS)  for their tireless work over the past several years in getting the word out in print and online re: the importance of supporting these two public school projects. Until the Phase 1 approval all of our six schools, in varying levels, were in a terrible state of disrepair as well as being basically outmoded. Major problems in the three remaining locations include the dearth of both suitable children car dropoff area and extracurricular activities space, as well as wholesale crowding due to hallways being used for storage locations. But most significantly, on the all-important safety issue the three schools have fallen out of code compliance, with many classrooms lacking fire alarms and sprinkler systems, and incredibly still containing asbestos in some areas. There is also the complete absence of building security systems, which have become extremely popular nationally since the Newtown tragedy.

   Voter approval of these articles will be a win-win for Salem residents. It will finally bring the Soule, Fisk and Haigh school infrastructures into the 21st century, helping to enrich the current crop of students in attendance as well as future generations of our young ones. And as school renovations always translate into the raising of property values in surrounding areas, homeowners can look forward to a reversal of the downward turn in worth that many of our domiciles have experienced in the past five years. For much more information on PHASE 2 please GOOGLE Strengthen Our Schools. And also please join with me and thousands of other Salem citizens in approving PHASE 2, Articles 2 and 3 on Tuesday, March 12.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aquarius

6:54 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013

Don't count your eggs until they're hatched.

Reply

Tom Linehan

6:52 am on Wednesday, February 27, 2013

The most effective opponents of fixing up elementary schools are the proponents from my point of view. Many of the claims simply don't stand up to scrutiny.

I have spoken to two of them on my blog. There is no scientific evidence that students learn more in improved facilities or by small changes in class size or even in most changes in class size. When proponents make such claims I wonder about the rest of those claims. What other claims are invalid? When school officials make such claims they lose credibility.

Ctd

Reply

Tom Linehan

6:52 am on Wednesday, February 27, 2013

The same is true in posts like this. Some of the assertions above are questionable. For instance "incredibly still containing asbestos in some areas." Asbestos mitigation often does not include removal. In fact, some time ago, removing Asbestos at the Junior High caused serious issues. The presence of asbestos per se may not be an issue if it is covered and sealed or in some other way prevented from becoming airborne. Claims like this make me wonder what else may not be legitimate.

Such nonsense is not unique to this situation. The school district once claimed that oil tanks that last for decades are an annual expense. In the last High School renovation proposal, I could find no one who knew where the bearing partitions are. How can any one plan major work on a building without knowing the existing structure? There is also a long history of the school district ignoring the vote of the people. I would love to vote for this. But the proponents are forcing me in the other direction.

Reply

Underwater Couple

10:56 am on Wednesday, February 27, 2013

I am glan Kleesens wants approval of Phase 2. Why might you ask? Well he is always contrarian to common sense. Typical of democrats.

Reply

Leave a comment