Experts predict 6,000 jobs could be lost, local businesses at risk
(CONCORD, NH) – With less than a month to act, the U.S. faces a real risk of going over the “fiscal cliff” – a dangerous combination of spending cuts and tax expirations scheduled to hit on January 1 unless Congress and the White House take action.
The Congressional Budget Office predicts that the cliff could push the country back into a recession. In New Hampshire, up to 6,000 jobs would be lost if we go over the cliff, according to an analysis by PolEcon Research and George Mason University, and experts warn local economies could bear the brunt of losses.
“The consequences of the fiscal cliff are real – in many cases we’re already seeing them. But those are only the tip of the iceberg if Washington fails to address our debt problems,” said Sen. Lou D’Allesandro, co-chair of the Fix the Debt state chapter. “We might be far removed from the halls of Congress, but families across New Hampshire and businesses on Main Street are going to shoulder the consequences of going over the fiscal cliff.”
If lawmakers fail to avert the fiscal cliff, 18 percent of the federal money that is sent to the states will be eliminated. Those cuts will reduce funding for important local programs including education, housing, and low-income initiatives. Curtailments of federal grants will cut out 6.8 percent of all revenue New Hampshire receives on an annual basis, according to the Pew Center on the States, much of which has already been allocated into the state’s future spending plans. The combination of tax hikes and nearly across-the-board federal spending cuts would have profoundly negative effects on working families, funding for K-12 and higher education, and small businesses and major employers alike.
“Americans deserve leadership that watches out for their best interest. We should all be able to agree that going over the fiscal cliff is poor policy. I ask Congress to make the right choice and work together to forge a debt deal that helps the economy regain its footing,” added Arthur Klemm, a New Hampshire small business retailer and Fix the Debt state steering committee member.
Already, uncertainty around the fiscal cliff is affecting financial markets. A national survey by the National Association for Business Economists found 87 percent of respondents believe economic uncertainty is holding back the economy. Unfortunately, gridlock in Washington is threatening to push the country over cliff as the January 1 deadline looms.
Americans have expressed a desire for lawmakers in Washington to work together on comprehensive debt reduction legislation. A Gallup poll in December found 62 percent of Americans want government leaders to work on bipartisan solutions.
The Campaign to Fix the Debt is a nonpartisan coalition with more than 315,000 members active across 17 states. Members come from a broad range of social, economic, and political backgrounds. The Campaign supports a debt reduction framework that produces greater tax revenue, cuts wasteful spending, and improves important social programs, all while aimed at putting the long-term debt on a path of gradual reduction.
For more information on the Campaign to Fix the Debt please visit www.fixthedebt.org.
Jan Schmidt
2:11 pm on Monday, December 17, 2012
This is pure unadulterated B.S. The debt is on its way down, and has been for several years. We simply need to collect enough taxes to pay our bills, and we can do this in two ways - 1. Money earned over $250,000 should be taxed at the Clinton rates - and 2. We need to get people back to work so they can start paying taxes again. And we can do the second one by rewarding companies that hire Americans and start taxing companies that use foreign labor.
In January there will be no huge bill come to everyone's mailbox, there will be no scary-scary end of the world as we know it. And this fakie kind of grassroots drive is simply to force changes in our social safety net to the benefit of big money.
Please don't fall for it.
Joe
3:57 pm on Monday, December 17, 2012
@Jan - Show me the numbers Jan and you might make a believer out of me.
One Man Wolf Pack
2:14 pm on Tuesday, December 18, 2012
We are waiting for a shred of truth to come out of what you are saying Jan.
"The debt is on its way down, and has been for several years"
I believe this statement represents ignorance, with no shred of truth and is a complete disconnection from reality.
Care to recant and wake up from the dazed and confused Jan?
Proud Conservative
3:08 pm on Tuesday, December 18, 2012
Hey Jan - here are the real figures on the national debt by fiscal year:
'08 - 10.0 trillion
'09 - 11.9 trillion
'10 - 13.5 trillion
'11 - 14.8 trillion
'12 - 16.4 trillion
And the projected national debt for FY 2013 is estimated to be 17.5 trillion.
You are wrong! The national debt is not decreasing. It is steadily increasing. Just where do you get your bogus information from?
steve forte
3:26 pm on Tuesday, December 18, 2012
Spending on defense , federal law enforement and homeland security are at all time highes. Food stamp use is also at an alltime high. Please explain to us what was cut to cause a decrease in spending.
Now lets also keep in mind that if 1 yr you spend say $758 billion on a failed stimulous package , if you dont spend $758 billion the next yr , then yes , spending did go down.
Then you also have projected spending cuts.
As in " last yr we spent $3.2 trillion. This yr we were going to spend $3.8 trillion but we have since cut that to $3.5 trillion. So we cut spending by 300 billion"
Ah no actualy you incresed spending by $300 billion.
Jan Schmidt
4:17 pm on Tuesday, December 18, 2012
Excuse me, I meant to say"the deficit"
I understand the confusion, and I apologize profusely.
One Man Wolf Pack
5:47 pm on Tuesday, December 18, 2012
Ok, accepted, now provide fact that our defict has been going down for years..............
I am under the impression that the deficit has not gone down since the clintion-gingrinch negotiations.....from the BUSH, rediculous tax cuts instead of pay DOWN debt, to now the deficit has been going up; and under Obama by the biggest margin yet. Can you please point me to information that will help me reach your enlightenment?
Jan Schmidt
6:11 pm on Tuesday, December 18, 2012
Thank you...
Down and down
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/13/business/federal-deficit-for-2012-fiscal-year-falls-to-1-1-trillion.html?_r=0
Lots more at link,
"The shrinking deficit was a result of both higher tax receipts and lower government spending. Government receipts climbed 6.4 percent year-over-year as the economy grew stronger and certain tax breaks expired. Corporate income taxes were a “major contributor” to the rise in overall receipts, the administration report said, climbing to $242 billion, from $181 billion in 2011.
Moreover, outlays dropped $61 billion year-over-year because of falling military spending on Afghanistan and Iraq, tapering stimulus spending and the strengthening economy. “The largest decreases relative to the prior year came from the Department of Defense, unemployment insurance and Medicaid,” the report said."
One Man Wolf Pack
6:15 pm on Tuesday, December 18, 2012
JAN--First two paragraphs of your link
"WASHINGTON — The federal deficit fell to $1.1 trillion in the 2012 fiscal year, down from about $1.3 trillion a year earlier, the Obama administration said on Friday.
That is the smallest deficit since 2008 but represents the fourth year in a row that the deficit has exceeded $1 trillion. Before the recession, which prompted huge federal spending and large tax cuts, the deficit had never exceeded half a trillion dollars."
One Man Wolf Pack
6:19 pm on Tuesday, December 18, 2012
So going from less than 1/2 a trillion to 1.5 trillion then back to 1.1 trillion is a reduction?
"The deficit (previously debt) is on its way down, and has been for several years."---So hike it up tripple and then bring it down a little and claim a savings........is this really what you are standing on?
A bait and switch / farmers discount?
One Man Wolf Pack
6:25 pm on Tuesday, December 18, 2012
Jan, how much taxes, item 1, and at what rate of employment item 2 are needed to balance the budget? (no spending cuts needed at all? just completely increase revenue to meet current expenses?)
Seamus Carty
6:27 pm on Tuesday, December 18, 2012
"So going from less than 1/2 a trillion to 1.5 trillion then back to 1.1 trillion is a reduction?"
Either the liberals do not understand the numbers or they deliberately are trying to mislead people. Obama cranking the deficit up to 1.5T from .5T and then having it go down to $1.1T is not really a reduction. You'd think he took office in January 2011 the way he talks...
Hardy Har Har Har
6:45 pm on Tuesday, December 18, 2012
Hardy Har Har Har
One Man Wolf Pack
2:42 pm on Monday, December 17, 2012
"he debt is on its way down, and has been for several years." --please provide a reference for this statement Jan.
I think they are referring to defense cuts causing BAE and others to loose their jobs. Couple that with domestic discretionary cuts and state revenue from the federal government will be reduced. How exactly will NH NOT be effected?
Your right there will not be a big bill coming in the mail, there wont be a check either.
Gary A. Gahan
7:10 am on Tuesday, December 18, 2012
Duh really now folks the fiscal cliff might hurt? Perhaps one good slap on the wrist
right now to have to wake up and deal with and readjust lifestyles accordingly for ALL and not just a few might be in order otherwise we WILL be facing the devastation and reprisals that Greece has faced this year.....do we really want that folks. Debt going down? What mathematical wizardry is that I ask when we keep INCREASING the debt ceiling. And how about the 18% and 6.8% NOT being extracted from us at the point of a gun by the IRS thugs so that WASHINGTON alone can decide how to reapportion it back to the various state DISPROPORTIONATELY!!! NO let those monies stay in NH and allow us to determine how to best spend it. When it goes back and forth between here and Washington just how much do you think is being extracted in bureaucratic GOVERNMENT salaries to "administer" the funds? 10-15% or MORE each way
up and back! Let's stop this insidious foolishness please.
steve forte
10:43 am on Tuesday, December 18, 2012
Funny how the idea of living within our means is a " fiscal cliff" Let it happen. People voted for tax increases and spending cuts. Give the people what they asked for.
One Man Wolf Pack
6:33 pm on Tuesday, December 18, 2012
funny thing is that we will still run a deficit even with the "cliff" in effect.......so it is not exactly like it is within our means.
Reality Geezer
4:17 pm on Tuesday, December 18, 2012
More fear mongering and foot stomping..If you cant stand the facts, crawl back under your rock....................
Atlant Schmidt
9:57 am on Wednesday, December 19, 2012
Frankly, I'm for anything that will finally allow us to rein in, even just a little bit, this nation's ridiculous level of expenditures on "defense" (really, offense).
For decades now, we've bought into the idea that any cut to the "defense" budget would be devastating and leave us in a position to be taken-over by some imaginary bogeyman from somewhere. And meanwhile, China is *INVESTING* us into the grave as they fund their own internal economic development and form alliances around the world.
So if "going over the fiscal cliff" means we finally get a reduction in defense spending, I think that's fine. We'll probably still be spending more on "defense" than all of the other nations in the world combined.
One Man Wolf Pack
12:42 pm on Wednesday, December 19, 2012
I agree with this Atlant, completely. I also do not think we shoudl be the world police either which would reduce this expense; which is why I am in favor of going over the cliff actually.
steve forte
1:15 pm on Wednesday, December 19, 2012
Alant couldn't be more correct calling it offense. We can no longer afford or should we desire to be the worlds police dept. Realy need to take a look at some of these overseas bases. Okinawa? realy , wheres the threat there?