patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

POLL: Should Prisoners Get Early Release for Taking Classes?

Proposed bill would allow early release.

 

A member of the Adult Parole Board is speaking out against a bill that would allow inmates to reduce minimum sentences by completing classes while in jail, according to the Union Leader.

House Bill 1654 was approved by a House committee earlier this month, and is scheduled for a floor vote on Wednesday.

The bill offers prisoners who complete training and degrees while in jail the chance to have their sentences reduced. But Donna Sytek of Salem, a member of the Adult Parole Board and a former House Speaker, told the Union Leader the bill poses a threat to a cornerstone of the state's commitment to crime victims, truth-in-sentencing.

What do you think? Should inmates be allowed to reduce their minimum sentences by completing classes in jail? Or is this a bad idea? Vote in our poll below, and leave a comment with your thoughts on the proposal.

  • Should prisoners be offered early release in exchange for completing classes while in jail?

    (Voting has been closed for this question)
    • Yes
        33 (24%)
    • No
        101 (75%)
    Total votes: 134
  • Your vote will only count once. This is not a scientific poll. View Results Vote!
Related Topics: Donna Sytek, Early Release From Prison, and NH Statehouse

David Campbell

3:11 pm on Saturday, March 3, 2012

at this reading the score reads
19 people with a brain in their head
and 5 moonbats that should move to Vermont

Reply
Comment_arrow

David Campbell

4:59 pm on Saturday, March 3, 2012

I love Vermont, love the people, hate the government

Jeff Hatch

4:38 pm on Saturday, March 3, 2012

So they commit a crime. We spend who knows how much on a trial, keeping them locked up, providing them training/college education and they want to get out early. To hell with that, I'm with ya Donna.

I think anyone that earns a college education behind bars should pay the state back for the cost of that education just as if they were given a student loan. I could've saved myself a bundle if my kids decided to rob a 7-eleven instead of handing me the bill.

Reply

Angela Lewis Jones McCarter

8:27 am on Monday, March 5, 2012

Depending on y they r in to begin with but probably NOT!

Reply

jobia

9:45 pm on Friday, April 27, 2012

everyone deserves another chance.it is easy to say especially when u dont have a love one locked up.some people change.so if u dont have a love one locked up i dont expect for u to understand.what if jesus didnt give us a chance.where is our heart just because inmates are locked up it dont make them a bad person they just did something wrong.so stop judging or the lord will judge u.how u like that.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Susan Weir

9:49 pm on Saturday, January 26, 2013

like your comment 100% well done

ForThePeople

11:20 pm on Friday, April 27, 2012

A non-religious-based argument would be if you are just creating a holding tank without regard to the crime committed, what's the point? You invest all of this money in locking them up, what are they going to do afterwards? Society foots the bill both in the cost of the crime all the way through prison even when we are not talking about classes. Offering a way for prisoners to better themselves does the following:

1) give them a chance at a better life without crime afterwards
2) teaches inmates the tools to think critically and beyond themselves
3) teaches inmates the value of community
4) Prisons often have their own criminal enterprises going on within the prison. You need to give prisoners something to do besides attend Criminal University.

Otherwise, all you are doing is putting a life of crime on pause until their sentence is up, and then we repeat the same process at a further cost. I would say there is a lot of value in offering educational opportunities.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Proud Conservative

10:03 pm on Saturday, January 26, 2013

Lock 'em up for life and you eliminate all repeat offenses.

Dave Finley

4:31 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012

Drugs seem to be the driving force behind most crimes. When on drugs you do not think of the harm you are causing yourself or your family let alone the victims of the crime. I believe good kids can learn from there mistakes, that being said, we can not allow them to mistake after mistake and letting them off easy. I believe in punishment but lets check backrounds and evaluate wether the person is likely to commit a crime again or not. Let some of these people with college degrees use them. Rehab is to short of a period of time and it is also expensive, lets make rehab a manditory sentence that a Judge can hand down,right now there is no such law.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Proud Conservative

10:06 pm on Saturday, January 26, 2013

You cannot force rehab on a person who does not want it. It doesn't work. Oh, you can make them go through the program, but it won't do a bit of good.

Comment_arrow

Proud Conservative

10:08 pm on Saturday, January 26, 2013

I favor the sentences they hand down in Singapore - most drug offenses are punishable by death. Singapore does not have a drug problem! In fact the crime rate in Singapore is lower than any other spot on Earth.

Susan Weir

9:24 pm on Saturday, January 26, 2013

i agree with four the people a 100%

Reply

Leave a comment