patching...
Breaking: Man Who Recorded Woman Under her Home Sentenced to Prison »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

POLL: Do Recent 'Episodes' Paint NH House in a Bad Light?

Outgoing House Speaker William O'Brien ripped Democrats this week following the resignation of two recently elected state representatives.

 

It's been a wild week in the New Hampshire House, even though it isn't currently in session.

Much of the week has been spent debating whether State Representative-Elect Stacie Laughton, D-Nashua, should resign her post after it was learned that she failed to inform voters about her criminal record prior to the Nov. 6 election. She originally decided to resign, then reconsidered, then decided again on Thursday afternoon that she would step down.

Also this week, State Representative-Elect Robert Thompson, D-Manchester, announced that he is resigning his seat because he recently moved to Florida.

House Speaker William O'Brien, R-Mont Vernon, made it clear he's not leaving the speaker's seat quietly, issuing a press release Wednesday slamming the Democratic Party for failing to identify better candidates.

"These sad episodes paint the entire House in a bad light and demonstrate the need to get back to electing individuals who are committed to serving the people honorably," O'Brien said.

What do you think? Do the circumstances surrounding the resignations "paint the entire House in a bad light," as O'Brien said? Vote in our poll below, and share your thoughts in the comments field below.

  • Do you agree with House Speaker William O'Brien that the circumstances surrounding the recent resignations of two Democratic state representatives "paint the entire House in a bad light"?

    (Voting has been closed for this question)
    • Yes
        50 (49%)
    • No
        51 (50%)
    Total votes: 101
  • Your vote will only count once. This is not a scientific poll. View Results Vote!
Related Topics: House Speaker William O'Brien, Robert Thompson, and Stacie Laughton

Dan

12:14 pm on Saturday, December 1, 2012

As I am not a favorite of Bill O'Brien, I voted no on this. However for him to talk about this is like the stove calling the kettle black. His two years have seen several Republicans leave, ranging from saying stupid things like Marty Harty's beliefs on eugenics, to a State Rep who thought his license to drive was being a Republican State Rep, to his own Majority Leader saying on his resume that he worked for someone, and yet did not.

Yeah right Billy......we know, and they left. Please clean your desk, take your guns, and leave quietly, and leave the light on. We can do without the dark era that you left us in New Hampshire.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Dan

12:21 pm on Saturday, December 1, 2012

My feelings for Bill O'Brien do NOT contradict my feelings for regarding the Laughtons.

In regards to the Laughtons, you wanted this to go away.......well too bad. Didn't anyone ever tell you, that "It's better to give than decieve?"

Comment_arrow

Kevin Kervick

9:04 am on Sunday, December 2, 2012

On the contrary. It is payback time. The Democrats successfully labeled, isolated, and demonized O'Brien and other individuals and groups. The election was not about ideas at all. The Democrats made it about personalities. My guess is we will return the favor this year. Republicans do not corner the market on dopiness.

Comment_arrow

Stephen D. Clark

10:23 am on Sunday, December 2, 2012

The election wasn't about ideas, Mr. Kervick?

I guess that's because the notion of putting up signs along the roads into Massachusetts insulting the state was such a good one. Or turning the statehouse into a wild West saloon where you don't check your guns at the door was another good one. Or creating a new state militia to protect us from Vermont was a brilliant idea. Cutting funds for the state university system in half was not too drastic. Then of course, the rhetoric was over the top with hate. A little longer and maybe the truth about Obama's Kenyan birth would have finally come out in the statehouse.

Yeah, ideas didn't have an impact. It's all SO unfair to the poor little victims of their own arrogance, who should rule forever because they're always right. Really. The injustice of having to subject oneself to the rule of the people!

The Republicans don't own dopiness, but this last session they sure outdid anything preceding them. "Sieg Heil!" to Speaker O'Brien from the floor. That juicy little bon mot came from a Republican, not a Democrat.

The Democrats were so successful at labeling and isolating and demonizing O'Brien that even his own party believed it. You gotta admire that kind of effective propagandization.

Survivor.

12:52 pm on Saturday, December 1, 2012

Democrat house, democrat scandals.

Reply

No Longer interested

1:01 pm on Saturday, December 1, 2012

I guess what Mr. O'Brien is saying is that the Republican brand is so poor in NH that Republican candidates can't even beat out a less than honorable Democratic candidate, since voters went to the polls in that ward and chose the Democrats over Republicans without really knowing anything about the Democratic candidates.

If O'Brien had a clue, he would understand that the election of an unvetted Democratic candidate over Republicans was due mainly to the NH Speaker O'Brien legacy of ineptness

Reply

Jan Schmidt

1:30 pm on Saturday, December 1, 2012

Laughton's controversy reflects badly on her.
Thompson's inability to remove his name from the ballot in time is unfortunate.
Any and all who have disgraced themselves, including O'Brien's second in command DJ, have themselves to blame... Not their party

With 400 seats to fill every two years and a salary of $100 a year, tolls and mileage, NH is lucky to have as many dedicated and worthy Representatives as it does.

And O'Brien's statement reflects badly on O'Brien.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ricky W Kracker a.k.a. Diggy Swagga

6:39 pm on Saturday, December 1, 2012

Jan, aka Tesha,
You posted on under your pseudo name Tesha:
“The Catholic Church in a powerful force in Maine so when the men in dresses who f*** little altar boys told their parishoners[sic] that gay marriage was wrong and a sin, the rubes in the pews believed it and voted as they had been told”
How can you represent Nashua Ward 1 when you hate Catholics so much?

Barbara Crawford

7:40 pm on Saturday, December 1, 2012

Right . Left. Red. Blue. Don't we think it' a just time to roll our sleeves up and just try to make things work for a change? No elected official should have a criminal background and those who have run and subsequently won make a mockery of our political system. Personally I am tired of the ideal that we have only democrats or republicans to run the show. It's not working. Lets stop the finger pointing, name calling and other childish actions. How about we just do the right thing for change and make New Hampshire what it should be? Lets look beyond the invisible bars so nicely kept by this two party system that does nothing term after term but fail to do their jobs? The faces change yet the agenda always seems to remain the same.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Kevin Kervick

9:07 am on Sunday, December 2, 2012

That would be nice, Barbara. But unfortunately if you do that you remove the Democratic Party reelection strategy.

Comment_arrow

Stephen D. Clark

10:11 am on Sunday, December 2, 2012

When you have two polar opposite philosophical views vying for control of power, then there's no middle ground available for compromise. Every piece of legislation becomes a power play.

Bob Elliott

7:23 am on Sunday, December 2, 2012

Rep. William O'Brien is a man of strong beliefs and leadership qualities. You either were with him, or against him. He never looked back to see who was following him. He single handedly turned a rag tag army of Republicans individualists and molded them into a united party that reduced the Democratic deficit of $800 MILLION dollars. Sometimes he ruled with an iron fist, sometimes with his Irish charm. I for one admire his strong beliefs, while flinching on some of his social issues. All that he has done will now be overturned by our new speaker, a Democrat, who has some of his same qualities , a woman I admire, who wears a velvet glove , covering a steel fist. The first round of Democratic intentions was fired by all agencies presenting a budget increase of almost $2 billion dollars, while dealing with candidate scandals of their own. Both parties have strengths, and both have weaknesses. In spite of it all, we have a beautiful state to live in , with a 5.2% unemployment rate, one of the lowest in the
country. God bless us all, and" Tiny Tim too.!! "

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mike Healey

10:30 am on Sunday, December 2, 2012

I'll bite, Why did you move?

Comment_arrow

Charlie Roth

1:58 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

did you ever post why you moved? dont see anything....

Charles Hatch

8:59 am on Sunday, December 2, 2012

Time to watch Kelly Ayotte on CNN.... Should be interesting .
With respect to the topic .. New Hampshire will go on, besides
wasn't there just an Election ... Statewide & nationally.... Yes I'm certain
Of it .. Here's a date to sear into your Consciousness. January 1st 2013.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mike Healey

10:30 am on Sunday, December 2, 2012

You can hear it in her voice, even she is disgusted by what she is saying.

Kevin Kervick

9:13 am on Sunday, December 2, 2012

O'Brien is hated because he had the gall to actually cut spending and enact a liberty reform agenda that is unmatched throughout the country. When you take away goodies, people get upset. If you challenge unions they will spend millions to unseat you. Just look at the proposed new budgets from NH Department Heads. There is your answer. Let the good times roll!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Kevin Murphy

3:02 pm on Sunday, December 2, 2012

Unions only spend millions. Corporations and out of state interests spend billions to buy Republicans.

Comment_arrow

No Longer interested

8:53 am on Monday, December 3, 2012

Maybe the people of NH are more observant than you Kevin. They see that when ALEC pulls the strings, Mr. Obrien becomes animated.

Reality Geezer

9:28 am on Sunday, December 2, 2012

O'Brien is toast--why would anyone care what his ohpinion is????

Reply

steve forte

9:39 am on Sunday, December 2, 2012

On July 5, 2006, Laughton and her now ex-wife Lisa went to Weirs Beach to view the annual fireworks display. Police reports obtained from the Laconia Police said the Laughtons called city police via 9-1-1 at 2:13 a.m., at 3:16 a.m. and at 3:45 a.m. because they were stranded.
They were told city police were not in a position to give them a ride back to Laconia proper — about five miles — where the two lived.
On the last call to 9-1-1, Laughton stated she was suicidal and that Lisa Laughton had fallen. They requested two ambulances and two were sent, along with a city police officer.
Both were transported to Lakes Region General Hospital where Laughton told the attending physician initially that he had called the ambulance because he couldn't sleep and suffered from depression.
In the next breath, reports indicate Laughton said, "Honestly Doc, I was at the Weirs fireworks and didn't have a ride home."

yep sounds like a stand up guy, oops girl.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Kevin Kervick

9:53 am on Sunday, December 2, 2012

Steve: Did you forget the narrative? O'Brien is an awful meanie and the Democrats are about to take us to the promised land with their perfect candidates. Repeat after me. "O'Brien is mean, O'Brien is reactionary, O'Brien is evil." Stop thinking man, just recite the mantra. What's wrong with you?

steve forte

9:58 am on Sunday, December 2, 2012

Well Kevin I keep thinking how terrible a balanced budget is . The fact that this rep was ordered to pay $1991 in restitution 4 yrs ago and has to date only paid $285 has me thinking not paying bills is the way some want things done here.

Reply
Comment_arrow

s. savoy

10:14 am on Sunday, December 2, 2012

I wonder how much the Laughtons spent on campaigning. They could have paid down the court order instead, however little it was. Poor judgement if you ask me.

Comment_arrow

Kevin Kervick

10:23 am on Sunday, December 2, 2012

Just repeat after me, "O'Brien is mean, O'Brien is reactionary, O'Brien is evil." Ohm...

Comment_arrow

Dan

2:10 pm on Sunday, December 2, 2012

Steve: Irregardless of the transgender issue, the fact remains that the Laughtons have caused a great deal of trouble for the State of New Hampshire. While it is true she ran as Democrat, the problem is that the law while seemlingly straightforward, is somewhat vague to some (?)

Yet, considering that you add the scandals that happened during the DasFuhrenspeker O'Brien's tenure, with a State Rep who thought that eugenics was a great thing, bullying a female member of his own party, and then his "Boy Wonder" DJ Bettencourt who decided to lie about his work history, it isn't surprising that Das Fuhrenspeker O'Brien would come out one last time to make himself look relevent in the beating his party, and himself took.

As a Democrat, and others have been critical of the Laughtons. While Ken Gidge can shoot his mouth off on this issue, one thing is clear. NO political party in this state has a corner on the honesty market, or being squeaky clean on the scandal issues. So please don't Mr. Blowhard, (Ken Gidge) make you believe otherwise.

Mike Healey

10:28 am on Sunday, December 2, 2012

Its a silly notion that our crazy state legislature is any crazier than any other states legislatures. And funnier still that Bully Boy O'Brien would try to peg the craziness on Democrats. Maybe Bully Boy O'Brien has the short term memory of Dory the fish, but the New Hampshire electorate doesn't and we will be glad to end Bully Boy O'Brien's time as the conductor of New Hampshire's Legislative Crazy Train.

Reply

Kevin Kervick

10:29 am on Sunday, December 2, 2012

Solid choice by Democrat voters in Nashua there. And the Nashua media did an outstanding job uncovering this before the election, OOps. Thank God we have far better judgment in Portsmouth. Our machines are jerking all over the place apparently: http://www.seacoastonline.com/articles/20121202-NEWS-212020348

Reply
Comment_arrow

Dan

2:27 pm on Sunday, December 2, 2012

Kevin: In regards to Rep Pitts, this country has had a history of creating laws that no one can enforce properly, or are just extremely stupid. Neither Republican or Democrats have a corner on that issue. Or should I say the both have a corner on that.

Remember the words of the constitution "In an effort to create a MORE perfect union." That did not mean we elect god, nor are we as humans EVER going to create a perfect union. New Hampshire is far from perfect.

Comment_arrow

Seamus Carty

7:56 am on Saturday, December 8, 2012

Nice story. This state rep put her infant grandson on a ride outside a store. An infant? And somehow, it is the ride's fault she was injured?

Kevin Kervick

10:32 am on Sunday, December 2, 2012

Just repeat after me, "O'Brien is mean, O'Brien is reactionary, O'Brien is evil." Ohm... Thinking optional, if not discouraged entirely.

Reply

Stephen D. Clark

10:32 am on Sunday, December 2, 2012

Speaker O'Brien is right about the Democrats' failure to identify better candidates. We should have consulted with D.J. Bettencourt before we got rolling.

Reply

not-so-free

11:58 am on Sunday, December 2, 2012

Why did Rep-elect Thompson leave NH?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Charlie Roth

4:22 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

he never replyed to his comment above where he wrote "Noone asked me why I moved"

not-so-free

12:01 pm on Sunday, December 2, 2012

Also, in regards to the light on the House, of course not. These individuals have all brought their shame everywhere they go, not just the State House. In fact, since neither were sworn in, how can that reflect on the elected membership?

Reply

Nelson L

5:12 pm on Sunday, December 2, 2012

No, not "all voters" but any voter that blindly votes by party affiliation whether that be Democrat or Republican. I see no reason to sugarcoat this statement.

"In a democracy, when you lose elections, the only other way to political power is force." So from one comment, you thought to ascribe this sort of thinking to me? Quite the contrary, I vote in order to reduce the amount of force regularly exercised by those in government.

Tell me Stephen, for what purpose was the Second Amendment written?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Stephen D. Clark

6:04 pm on Sunday, December 2, 2012

The majority elected Obama, Mr. Nelson. Who else could you be referring to?

The Second Amendment was allegedly written to ensure that a well regulated militia would supposedly remain necessary to the security of a free state, but 1) the only well regulated militia we have is the National Guard, and 2) a militia isn't necessary because we have the Pentagon, and 3) if this nonexistent militia confronted the Pentagon in a states' rights sort of dispute, the militia would be utterly smashed into a million bits with rebel flesh strewn everywhere.

It's time to repeal the Second Amendment and replace it with another one guaranteeing some gun rights but not military ones because the Second Amendment no longer applies to any national security reality confronting the United States today.

Kevin Kervick

5:28 pm on Sunday, December 2, 2012

I disagree with Dan above. The Democratic Party is the party of lawyers, entitlement, unions and protecting people from their own stupidity. That's why I left that party 15 years ago. So much of the bloat and overreach of the state can be attributed to politicians pandering to perceived protection interests. Usually it is for the children as a friend of mine recently illustrated with this Simpson's clip. http://youtu.be/Qh2sWSVRrmo

Reply
Comment_arrow

Stephen D. Clark

5:58 pm on Sunday, December 2, 2012

Don't forget African Americans, Mr. Kervick. The Democratic Party is for them, too - not just children.

Oh, and gays. Them too. And women. And religious minorities ... and Latinos. The Democratic Party represents them better. And the poor and the working class. Basically, anyone who's not rich. You know, the majority.

Go ahead and sneer at them as "children." So lovely to behold. And guaranteed to help you make inroads in the shifting demographics that increasingly turn away from the ugliness of conservative contempt.

Comment_arrow

Stephen D. Clark

6:21 pm on Sunday, December 2, 2012

News Flash, if you want to know who the felons are, don't ask Jeb Bush or Katherine Harris. They'll say you're one and deny you the vote.

Comment_arrow

Dan

10:54 pm on Tuesday, December 4, 2012

Kevin: For starters, where you get the notion that the Democrats are a party of lawyers, entitlement, unions and protecting people from their own stupidity," one will never know. However, to use Youtube to do your thinking for you is akin to the Republican's obsession with Fox News. A bunch of hogwash.

No one is doubtin a mistake was made, however, I will note that the Tea Party, elected several people, including one female in the Upper Midwest who had several driving offenses including criminal speeding. Also if you hadn't read the article, you will have noticed to that the NHRSC, has had their share of people who have said really stupid things about cops, and other assorted situations too.

Furthermore, the state legislature in this state is a "volunteer legislature." I am sure there are MANY attorney's who as Republicans do their best for business only, and do nothing of the sort for the middle class in this state, including some State Retirees (former State Cops, and other people who have worked at the expense of the taxpayers).

Plus ask anyone political pundit in this state, and they agree, that Billy O'Brien did overreach with his supermajority. So try again. You are way off target.

Comment_arrow

Kevin Murphy

10:25 pm on Friday, December 7, 2012

Democrats want to govern. Republicans want to rule. Why did the Republicans lose the elections if they're so smart?

Riley Reid

5:37 pm on Sunday, December 2, 2012

I guess Mr O'Brien forgets about the Rep from Hampton who lead Police on a chase and was driving on a suspended license. Or how about DJ and his pursuit of a law degree. O'Brien and DJ concerning a female rep and driving her to tears. O'Brien clearing the gallery because he didn't like the union folks in the House,,,,,hmmmmm I could go on, but there is a reason he was called a "Bully" and hopefully we won't have a year in Concord like we did last year.

Reply

Kevin Kervick

5:54 pm on Sunday, December 2, 2012

Of course we will not. If Hassan, Norelli, and the unions get their way we will have a year of dramatically expanded spending, more regulations, more lawyering, and more government workers. We have become a nation of whiny little girls. Tough decision-making is considered mean. Massaging egos is nice.

Reply

Kevin Kervick

7:05 pm on Sunday, December 2, 2012

Yes, I know, Mr. Clark. If there is a group of people with an axe to grind the Democrats will come running. If there isn't yet an identified victim group, the Democrats will create one so they have someone to rescue. It isn't an accident that the US has more lawyers per capita by far than any other country in the world. They support a me first rather than a Kennedy-esque we first mentality.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mike Healey

7:42 pm on Sunday, December 2, 2012

No one cries victim more than Republicans.

Comment_arrow

Stephen D. Clark

7:48 pm on Sunday, December 2, 2012

I reject your "victim group" characterization. "Advocacy group" is far less spiteful and dismissive of real people.

When people see which parties take what stands they do, they remember it in the next election. And maybe many more elections after that, too.

You can't say that Democrats created Todd Akins or Richard Mourdock. They are Republicans' own Frankenstein babies come back to help their makers. Democrats scared Strom Thurmond out of the party and into Republican arms with desegregation. Desegregation wasn't the Democrats' creation of a "victim group" so much as it was part of its rescue.

Comment_arrow

Dan

10:58 pm on Tuesday, December 4, 2012

Mr. Kervick....apparently you didn't read as to why Romney lost. Apparently the fact that Veterans (some of which who were severly injured or dismembered) where in the 47% of people whom Romney claimed "couldn't or wouldn't take care of themselves."

However keep talking like you are...........we can rack up a few more elections from the mouth of clueless individuals like you...

Kevin Kervick

7:36 pm on Sunday, December 2, 2012

Oh, Gawd. Did you just pull that out of your backside? Governance is not supposed to be popular. It is supposed to be right, which means constitutional. Any schmuck can stand in Concord and deliver monies and services by referendum. It takes fortitude to be a statesman. Everybody wants to be loved and they want their stuff. The problem is there isn't enough private wealth in the state to pay for all the stuff politicians promise for votes.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Stephen D. Clark

7:42 pm on Sunday, December 2, 2012

Governance isn't supposed to be popular? Gee. Too bad it depends on voting.

Comment_arrow

Dan

11:05 pm on Tuesday, December 4, 2012

Funny how it is that Government shouldn't be popular under Republican Control. That is why George W. had to start a war to keep himself in office. Also your constitutional reasoning is a joke. After all, the Republicans have been sticking to that "schtick" dating back to Iran/Contra, and Watergate. Also, this idea of bringing home the money? Why do you think Pease AFB went south? Because the Republicans in the South wanted their military bases to screw so-called liberal states like New Hampshire (which had a Republican Governor at the time of announcement). Portsmouth would have been long gone also.

Also you don't count all the breaks that Dubya gave the oil companies, who were right there signing his energy policy.

The only thing pulled out of your backside is your selective memory...

Kevin Kervick

6:16 am on Monday, December 3, 2012

If you can get someone to believe they are part of a victim group you can accomplish two things. You can give them a sense of identity and you can get them angry. The Democrats are masters at exploiting this aspect of human psychology in order to expand the things government does. Look at this election. Victim groups galore. Obama exploited this better than anyone I can remember.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Stephen D. Clark

7:07 am on Monday, December 3, 2012

The Democrats have been staunch advocates for civil rights and social justice for minorities of almost any stripe and for women, who are not a minority. Women are more than 50% of the electorate. Being perceived in a democracy as an advocate for women sounds pretty smart to me. Actually being one is even smarter because it's righteous.

So go ahead and keep saying "victim group." Now you sound like you think you're part of one: Republicans. You guys are victims of your own history and the declining popularity in your platform planks.

In 2005, former Chairman of the Republican National Committee Ken Mehlman appeared before the NAACP and apologized for the Republicans' history of exploiting southern white bitterness over desegregation known as its "Southern Strategy." The chairman of the RNC doesn't go around apologizing to so-called "victim groups" over imaginary things.

When you see an injustice and correct it, then you can win eternal gratitude. African Americans were Republicans for decades after the Civil War. When an injustice exists but you deny it exists and seek to prevent action to correct it, then you win enduring reproach. Today African Americans are solid Democrats.

So reap the whirlwind and cry boo-hoo-hoo. This is what has happened on that issue since the "states' rights" Barry Goldwater Republicans took over the GOP.

You'll have to work to end democracy since human nature and statistics generally dictate the outcomes of elections.

Kevin Kervick

6:59 am on Monday, December 3, 2012

The Democrat solutions have been an abysmal failure because they are always government-centric. The Great Society was a colossal failure because it disempowered families and communities. It destroyed the black family. The Democratic Party is exploiting racial identity for votes - pure and simple. If you are falling for their ruse, you are an enabler.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Stephen D. Clark

7:14 am on Monday, December 3, 2012

Democrats have been an abysmal failure? Depends upon your perspective. The government-centricity of the Democratic approach to governance has been their dominant style since the Great Depression when Democrats held the White House for 20 consecutive years. What happened during then?

Let's see: We became the richest and mightiest nation on earth and remain so today. I wouldn't call that an "abysmal failure." The Great Society programs have been an improvement over what preceded them, which was nothing but neglect. Today, thanks to the history Democrats imposed on the nation against the will of Republicans, an African American sits in the Oval Office.

African Americans know whom their advocates are, and they know who denies and resists the advocacy.

Kevin Kervick

7:35 am on Monday, December 3, 2012

Victim advocacy and social justice are excuses to grow the state. Obama wants to grow the state. FDR and Johnson wanted to grow the state. They created intentional massive jobs programs that are still with us and have us on the verge of bankruptcy. More importantly, these jobs programs ensure that there must be an ever-increasing supply of recipients of services in order to maintain the jobs. The programs are iatrogenic to community health. These programs need clients so the pool must continue to grow. The country gets forever sicker and poorer. Same with the prison and military systems. We need incarcerants and enemies to keep those statist enterprises growing. The US now spend more public money per person than France. At least they get free education and free healthcare. We get very little in return. Both parties have bought into this ruse, although the Democrats are practically orgasmic over the new avenues created by Obama. At least there are some liberty republicans speaking out against it.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Stephen D. Clark

5:34 pm on Monday, December 3, 2012

People didn't vote for Obama because they're victims. They voted for Obama because Republicans are nuts.

Look at this last election. Romney won the Republican primaries, but he had extraordinary difficulties against very weak and marginal candidates. And what they did then showed the country just how wacky the GOP has become with Rick Perry, Herman Cain, Michele Bachmann, Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum. Applauding for the death penalty, booing a soldier in a combat zone because he's gay, accusing African Americans of being food stamp moochers.

All in all, it was a pretty repulsive display, and it helped Obama immeasurably.

The only victims here were victims of their own dumb ideas.

Comment_arrow

Dan

11:15 pm on Tuesday, December 4, 2012

In the new 2013 Webster's Dictionary, under the word "Denial" you will find a picture of Mr. Kervick, and a few million more of Republicans who just can't understand why they lost this years election.

Apparently Mr. Kervick was one of Karl Rove's minnions. I bet he was waiting like Mr. Rove was for Cayuga County Ohio to win the election for Romney.

Only problem is that county had a 4-to-1 Democratic Majority, which made Karl Rove have a coniption fit.

Mr. Kervick, you lost. Get over yourself.

Kevin Kervick

7:50 am on Monday, December 3, 2012

That's the point. We are not the richest and mightiest nation earth. Those chickens have come home to roost. We have spent ourselves into oblivion. Sure, we have a lot of bombs. But we have become fatter, dumber, more depressed, more anxious, more likely to be divorced or unmarried. more likely to be on medication, more entitled, more greedy, and more likely to be on public assistance in some manner, whether it be the public or the corporate welfare variety. Our FED prints money out of thin air or we borrow it to afford this stuff, to expand the artificial economy at the expense of the real economy. We justify much of it for the children, or for social justice, or because there is a war on somebody, or because crime is increasing, or for any number of contrived, well intentioned reasons. We are near the end of the line. Something has to give.

Reply
Comment_arrow

steve forte

8:10 am on Monday, December 3, 2012

Problem is , many cannot see it for what it is. As the saying goes " the road to hell is paved with good intentions" No one ever said " we need to pass this bill because it will be awful for the American public" Thing is whenever someone comes up with a great idea, they always seem to never bother looking at the consequences. Every action has a reaction.

Comment_arrow

Stephen D. Clark

5:27 pm on Monday, December 3, 2012

You say that we are not the richest and mightiest nation on earth? Ha, hah! Nice talking to you, Mr. Kervick. You made my day.

Comment_arrow

Dan

11:19 pm on Tuesday, December 4, 2012

We are NOT the richest country in the world, Mr. Kervick.

Right, so we should have given Romney 4 years to give 52% in tax breaks to the top 5%, so that 95% could pay for the tax cuts.

Yet there are people like you blaming people on welfare for all this. Forget how it was when George W., took a surplus into a deficit, and into the largest recession.

Ask not what your Republican Party can do for you Mr. Kervick, Ask what your Republican Party can do for the top 5% in this country...

ForThePeople

10:12 am on Monday, December 3, 2012

Since when is "civil rights" considered "victim advocacy?" Are you a free stater?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Kevin Kervick

5:39 pm on Monday, December 3, 2012

The legitimate civil rights movement has been exploited repeatedly by statists and race hustlers who have use the plight of African-Americans and other minority groups to enact all sorts of harmful law.

Comment_arrow

Stephen D. Clark

5:55 pm on Monday, December 3, 2012

Statism is what was necessary to fulfill the African American civil rights movement since states were practicing Jim Crow segregation and were resisting necessary changes. It took the intervention of a superior power to make them do right.

Progress in civil rights legislation and its enforcement--especially enforcement--vindicated statism. The success of the New Deal and the post-war boom years vindicated statism. Statism isn't automatically bad, and African Americans are more likely to support its use because they know firsthand that it can be necessary at times. Even Chris Christie knows it. Did you see the way he was kissing Obama's ring for his slice of statist pie? That was delightful.

JP

10:49 am on Monday, December 3, 2012

As far as I'm concerned, no one could have served the people less honorably or painted the House in a worse light than Bully O'Brien. Talk about the pot calling the kettle black!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

steve forte

3:43 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

So do you beleive someones who not only called an ambulance for a ride home from the fireworks but called 2 of them should be deciding how taxpayer money should be spent?

Kate Messner

6:22 pm on Monday, December 3, 2012

Back to the question of the poll: Do Recent 'Episodes' Paint NH House in a Bad Light? In my opinion, yes, they do. Many have already stated that both parties are guilty of less than honorable behavior and I completely agree. But it's curious that nobody has mentioned yet how Ms. Laugton's behavior reflects on other transgendered people as well as Democrats. As already stated by others, there have been numerous blemishes on Republicans as well. What gets me is that we are still indignant when these things come to light. We are governed by people and people are fallible, folks. We always have been and always will be. The best we can do is try to consider more carefully when selecting (then backing) candidates and then once we've made our choices pay attention to decisions being made. We're speaking out on Patch, which is good, but not very productively. "He said", "She said", isn't going to move us forward.

I happened to be sitting in the same church as Ms. Laughton on Sunday morning. And frankly, while I'm mad as Hell at these facts in her/his past, still we, as humans are called to forgive. "Let him who has no sin cast the first stone." I am not condoning the behavior of Ms. Laughton any more than I condone the behavior of Mr. O'Brien. But each of us should pick up a mirror from time to time, that's all. We do live in a great state and a great country. Let's not lose sight of these nor of the dignity of every other human being with whom we come in contact.

Reply

ForThePeople

10:31 pm on Monday, December 3, 2012

Stephen, is this your first time meeting News flash? :-) This is actually better than his/her election coverage. :-P

Reply
Comment_arrow

Stephen D. Clark

10:41 pm on Monday, December 3, 2012

FTP, eunuchs are to be pitied. I tried to be kind, but it wasn't appreciated. So used to being kicked and spurned by the world, he ... uh, she ... hmm ... "it" just snarled and snapped. So sad.

Comment_arrow

Dan

11:31 pm on Tuesday, December 4, 2012

Mr. Clark: News Flash is just another brainwashed minion of the Republican Party, who gets propagandized from everything he hears from Rush and his ilk to FAUX NEWS.

Personally, I don't see any difference with the election version of News Flash and the current. Just the same worn out record, warped and scratched that has a movement of lemmings who cannot understand, that the GOP only wants people like News Flash to vote for them with the guise they will get rich, and get tax breaks, only to find they are paying for the tax breaks that Republicans feel are deserving of the top 5% in this country.

There is nothing new with News Flash. He's as predictable as he is misguided.

Comment_arrow

Stephen D. Clark

10:59 am on Saturday, December 8, 2012

Hey Dan, thank goodness we have News Flash here to make all Republicans look bad. He serves a useful function after all.

Watts

3:09 am on Tuesday, December 4, 2012

Hey News Fish, how is Rasmussen treating you these days?

At least you haven't allowed being proven wrong tens of thousands of times on here, curb your confidence in the idea that the delusional world that you have swirling around in your head is actually reality.

But for the rest of us who live in the actual real world, we can't help but to laugh at your posts.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mike Healey

9:13 am on Tuesday, December 4, 2012

Of course Nashua Republicans deserve just as much blame.

Comment_arrow

Dan

11:33 pm on Tuesday, December 4, 2012

@ Mike Healey: Wow...what a shocker. News Flash can't answer that one...

@ News Flash: The real loser is you. One who cannot accept defeat is defeated.

Proud Conservative

8:53 pm on Saturday, December 8, 2012

Nashua is the armpit of New Hampshire - and that's putting it mildly.

Reply
Patch_comments_icon

Carol Robidoux

9:47 pm on Saturday, December 8, 2012

Proud Conservative, my bias is showing here, but I've been to many corners of New Hampshire and Nashua is far from an armpit.

Reply

Leave a comment