patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

What Do You Think of Obama's Gun Control Measures?

President Obama spoke of 'consensus' on curbing gun violence. Share your thoughts in the comments field below.

 

President Obama today, a month after the Sandy Hook shooting, announced 23 executive actions designed to curb gun violence. He outlined steps to strengthen background checks for gun purchases and a campaign to promote responsible gun ownership.

The 23 actions included requiring federal law enforcement to trace guns recovered in criminal investigations, clarifying that the Affordable Care Act does not prohibit doctors from asking patients about guns in the home, and incentives for districts to hire school resource officers.

Obama also called on Congress to back an assault weapons ban and restrictions on high-capacity ammunition magazines.

Following the Connecticut shooting and ensuing public debate, the National Rifle Association pushed back "in defense of gun owners."

Here is a statement released Jan. 16, following Obama's remarks:

"Throughout its history, the National Rifle Association has led efforts to promote safety and responsible gun ownership. Keeping our children and society safe remains our top priority.

The NRA will continue to focus on keeping our children safe and securing our schools, fixing our broken mental health system, and prosecuting violent criminals to the fullest extent of the law.  We look forward to working with Congress on a bi-partisan basis to find real solutions to protecting America’s most valuable asset – our children.

Attacking firearms and ignoring children is not a solution to the crisis we face as a nation.  Only honest, law-abiding gun owners will be affected and our children will remain vulnerable to the inevitability of more tragedy.

Wayne MacDonald, chairman of the New Hampshire Republican State Committee, released this statement Wednesday afternoon:

"The gun laws the President put forward today are not necessary, especially with thousands of gun laws already on the books. What he should be doing is looking to the laws we already have and enforcing those. Now is not the time to undermine law abiding citizens and their constitutional right to bear arms. President Obama has failed to address the real issues. Instead, he has made a power grab, rather than working for common sense solutions that protect our children, our communities, and our fundamental rights."

U.S. Rep. Carol Shea-Porter (D-NH, 1st District), had this to say about the president's plans:

“I agree with the President’s comprehensive approach to addressing gun violence. I will not and cannot forget the never-ending scenes of families and communities in shock and mourning, and I will not ignore the calls of our citizens to do something to help stop the violence. I support responsible gun ownership because Americans have a right to hunt or defend themselves, and they also have a right to expect to be safe as they go about their daily lives.”

What do you think of President Obama's executive actions and proposed gun control measures? And of the NRA's response? Share your thoughts in the comments field below.

Related Topics: Congress, Guns, National Rifle Association, and President Obama

William Smith

1:51 pm on Wednesday, January 16, 2013

The NRA hasn't responded to the President's announcement today--at least not in the link in the story.

Further, the idea they promoted--more cops in schools--was one of the President's suggestions today.

Reply

Charles McDuffee

1:51 pm on Wednesday, January 16, 2013

It was well explained, well thought out, and I am dubious about anything getting through Congress. Congress does not care about the health and safety of average Americans. It cares about getting re-elected. Even the horrible death that the Newtown children endured will not soften the gun industry lead by the NRA with it's republican dupes.

Reply
Comment_arrow

John Wayner

7:05 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

Go to the movies and watch 45 minutes of promos and count the people that Hollywood kills in their shows. Not a word from Biden's follies. What a waste of taxpayer money.

Comment_arrow

Dennis Karoleski

8:20 am on Friday, January 18, 2013

An estimated 500 MILLION for exactly what? A failed so-called "assault rifle ban" (or has it been expanded to "assault weapon") this time of firearms that only look like real assault rifles. Hardly a peep about the real problem of mentally defective people on anti-depressants who actually comment these shootings. Sounded a lot like another useless, knew jerk, feel good propaganda piece aimed squarely between the doe-in-the-headlight eyes of the terminally firearm ignorant liberal gun heaters. Exactly what we would expect from Joe Biden and his panel of gun heaters. To paraphrase Einstein’s definition of insanity: To propose the same dumb law, (that only the law-abiding will obey), over and over but expect a different result each time.

Comment_arrow

Glenn Price

8:58 am on Tuesday, January 22, 2013

we need our guns all guns including tanks and fighter jets if necessary. If Obama does not give them all to egypt.

Proud Conservative

1:51 pm on Wednesday, January 16, 2013

Look at it this way. Illegal drugs are banned. That works well, eh? No one imports them, no criminals have them; no one sells them and no one uses them, right? Exactly the way any weapons ban will work - it won't. While I see no need for anyone to possess an assault rifle or a clip that holds 30 rounds, banning these will simply not eliminate the problem. Those that want them will still get them.

Reply
Comment_arrow

steve forte

3:20 pm on Wednesday, January 16, 2013

And keep in mind most drugs are imported and all are consumables. Once they are used you need to import more. Guns are already in this country and can be used over and over.
Ugly kid Joe Biden says" enforce the laws already on the books" well gee Joe , gun owners have been saying that for 20 yrs.

Comment_arrow

Ronald Bishop

7:38 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

So by that logic, all laws are useless because someone will break them.

Comment_arrow

skram bled

11:21 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

@Ronald, no, but that is perfect example of a straw man argument. Thanks for contributing.

@Proud Conservative, you're forgetting to mention Prohibition. That worked out really well too! But hey, at least in that case the country took the proper (yet stupid) steps of amending the Constitution. I wish the anti-gunners all the best luck in succeeding in this manner, ain't gonna happen!

David Martelli

1:51 pm on Wednesday, January 16, 2013

The executive actions seem as (most) of them are a good measure to incentive's areas not currently enforcing laws to work towards enforcing them. This would (hopefully) help them to actually follow laws that could help prevent bad guys from getting guns easily as well as help to find mental health issues earlier.

I do not personally agree with EO #16. Clarify that the Affordable Care Act does not prohibit doctors asking their patients about guns in their homes. This will have the probably effect of discriminating health care away from gun owners as has been seen before.

Remember, the gun is a tool, if you set up everyone that owns a gun as a probable criminal then you have already weighted your findings to reflect against those people. If you want to make the world a safer place, then you must look at it as a whole and not through a narrow point of view.

Reply
Comment_arrow

skram bled

11:21 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

Good point on #16. It will have the effect of making a gun-owner who is experiencing mental health issues from talking to a doctor about his or her issues and getting treatment. Sort of the opposite of what they're going for here.

Riley Reid

1:51 pm on Wednesday, January 16, 2013

It's not going to change anything. They need to restore a lot of the mental health programs that have been cut over the years and get these people some help. Responsible gun owners aren't committing these horrific acts.

Reply

Edward Comeau

2:29 pm on Wednesday, January 16, 2013

The Federal Government cannot control itself. How then will it control Guns?

Reply

Jan Schmidt

3:20 pm on Wednesday, January 16, 2013

I think its time to thank the President for stepping up to address a problem that needs America's attention. Please Congress - stop your temper tantrums and get to work making us all safer.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mike black

5:15 pm on Wednesday, January 16, 2013

Stepping up after kids were slaughtered on his watch deserves a thank you ?

Comment_arrow

Proud Conservative

7:05 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

His suggestions, even if fully implemented, would not have prevented Columbine, the movie massacre or the Sandy Hook shootings. Criminals and nut jobs are not law abiding citizens. If they want a gun they will get one. If they want to open fire in a crowd, they will do it. So why should we thank him for suggesting actions that would not have prevented the problem which gave rise to the discussion to begin with?

Comment_arrow

Dennis Karoleski

2:36 pm on Friday, January 18, 2013

I find it amazing any of us can could still trust anyone in congress to pass intelligent or effective legislation after their "vote and pass before reading" stupidly. Fool me once….

Jan Schmidt

3:20 pm on Wednesday, January 16, 2013

1. Issue a Presidential Memorandum to require federal agencies to make relevant data available to the federal background check system.

2. Address unnecessary legal barriers, particularly relating to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, that may prevent states from making information available to the background check system.

3. Improve incentives for states to share information with the background check system.

4. Direct the Attorney General to review categories of individuals prohibited from having a gun to make sure dangerous people are not slipping through the cracks.
5. Propose rulemaking to give law enforcement the ability to run a full background check on an individual before returning a seized gun.

6. Publish a letter from ATF to federally licensed gun dealers providing guidance on how to run background checks for private sellers.

7. Launch a national safe and responsible gun ownership campaign.

8. Review safety standards for gun locks and gun safes (Consumer Product Safety Commission).

9. Issue a Presidential Memorandum to require federal law enforcement to trace guns recovered in criminal investigations.

10. Release a DOJ report analyzing information on lost and stolen guns and make it widely available to law enforcement.

11. Nominate an ATF director.

Reply

Jan Schmidt

3:20 pm on Wednesday, January 16, 2013

12. Provide law enforcement, first responders, and school officials with proper training for active shooter situations.

13. Maximize enforcement efforts to prevent gun violence and prosecute gun crime.

14. Issue a Presidential Memorandum directing the Centers for Disease Control to research the causes and prevention of gun violence.

15. Direct the Attorney General to issue a report on the availability and most effective use of new gun safety technologies and challenge the private sector to develop innovative technologies.

16. Clarify that the Affordable Care Act does not prohibit doctors asking their patients about guns in their homes.

17. Release a letter to health care providers clarifying that no federal law prohibits them from reporting threats of violence to law enforcement authorities.

18. Provide incentives for schools to hire school resource officers.

19. Develop model emergency response plans for schools, houses of worship and institutions of higher education.

20. Release a letter to state health officials clarifying the scope of mental health services that Medicaid plans must cover.

21. Finalize regulations clarifying essential health benefits and parity requirements within ACA exchanges.

22. Commit to finalizing mental health parity regulations.

23. Launch a national dialogue led by Secretaries Sebelius and Duncan on mental health.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Apljak

3:44 pm on Wednesday, January 16, 2013

24. Continue to spend time on anything that will shift the focus away from the fact that this administration doesn't know how to stop spending even thought there is no way to pay for it!! Oh, my bad, was that not one of the Executive Orders. It must just be an unwritten rule!

Comment_arrow

MerrimackREZ

5:15 pm on Wednesday, January 16, 2013

24. Thank respectable and responsible gun owners for being there to protect us when the police are 10 minutes away. A responsible citizen with a gun is your best friend when you could be a victim of a crime. Take away the guns and you might as well invite violent crime to your home.

Comment_arrow

Proud Conservative

7:05 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

Which one of those would have prevent Sandy Hook?

Comment_arrow

Seamus Carty

2:18 pm on Thursday, January 17, 2013

25. Feel really good about yourself despite the fact that this will do little to take guns out of the hands of criminals...

Comment_arrow

Dennis Karoleski

8:20 am on Friday, January 18, 2013

Better be careful about # 14. Found this inconvenient tidbit of information: President Jimmy Carter also decided to push through comprehensive federal gun-control legislation. Being good democrats they decided the best way to stack the congressional deck would be to fund a massive scientific study which would undoubtedly proclaim gun-control laws were effective in reducing crime. So they doled out a major gun-control research grant to University of Massachusetts (then) anti-gun sociology professor James D. Wright and his equally biased colleagues Peter Rossi and Kathleen Daly. They spent four years and lots of tax dollars to produce what would be the most comprehensive, critical study of gun control ever undertaken. In 1981, they published the results of their research – an exhaustive, three-volume work titled “Under the Gun.” There was only one problem. Their findings, summarized starkly by co-author Wright, were that “Gun control laws do not reduce crime.” Of course Carter totally ignored it. There’s that definition of insanity again.

Apljak

3:44 pm on Wednesday, January 16, 2013

I find it pitiful that he exploited those children today.
Most of his orders will have zero effect on violent crime such as Newtown or Aurora and only cause more regulation and force spending of money we don't have.
He and his willing progressive conspirators are trying to obfuscate and reframe the true intent of the Second Amendment.
Interesting how he wants to limit the rights of responsible gun owners yet made no no mention of the effects of Hollywood or video game violence that plays a little mentioned role in all of thes violence.
I only hope that Congress steps in to fight this assault on our Constitutional Rights!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jan Schmidt

5:50 pm on Wednesday, January 16, 2013

And I think it's pitiful that something this monstrous had to happen before the country demanded and stood behind the action to address this problem.

Comment_arrow

Dennis Karoleski

8:20 am on Friday, January 18, 2013

And I found it pitiful he did nothing to address the problem everyone seems so willing to sweep under the carpet through this "assault rifle" smoke screen. That would be the glaring and inconvenient fact that all shooters, (except for these last three where the toxicology results are STILL being withheld), were on or withdrawing from prescription anti-depressant drugs.

Nancy P

5:15 pm on Wednesday, January 16, 2013

I agree Apljak about exploiting the kids for a photo op. Just imagine if Bush had signed anti-abortion legislation doing the same thing? The lefties would have a coronary.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mike Healey

3:15 pm on Thursday, January 17, 2013

I was going to say the same Jan, Bush did and the left did not over react

Nancy P

5:15 pm on Wednesday, January 16, 2013

This is yet another knee jerk reaction that the libs throw more money at while solving no problems.

Reply

Brenda Silva Gonzalez

5:15 pm on Wednesday, January 16, 2013

Responsible gun owners are not committing these crimes, so all of this pomp and circumstance won't do squat. And way to use those kids for your agenda. Pathetic!

Reply

Apljak

5:50 pm on Wednesday, January 16, 2013

I wonder if children were prompted to write letters about their fears of this administration spending their money and creating more debt for them, if he would hold a press conference with them about the debt ceiling...NOT!

Reply

R. Scott White

5:50 pm on Wednesday, January 16, 2013

According to most recent statistics available from the Centers of Disease Control, we apparently average 600 gun deaths per WEEK in the U.S including 56% for suicide and the rest for accidental or homicide. (We apparently average 223 deaths a week for homicide).
Can we all agree that this is too many and that something should be done? Doesn't Obama's plan help? That's all I'm looking for, a reduction in the obscene number of gun deaths in the U.S.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Apljak

7:05 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

Yes, I agree.
Maybe more money and time should have been spent on effective legislation as opposed to knee jerk reaction that attempts to minimize the rights of the citizenry.

Comment_arrow

F. R.

7:05 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

Ask the state of IL, specifically, Chicago how they manage to have the tightest gun restrictions in the USA and have the highest death rate from guns at the same time. It would appear Obama didn't have any success as a community organizer at the local level but I guess that would be speaking ill of him to most of you, his minions. He is well-suited to playing to the emotions of his followers, though. All he needs are lip-biting lessons from Bubba and the guise will be complete.

Comment_arrow

Proud Conservative

7:05 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

Guns are banned in Chicago - and they had more deaths from guns in 2012 than all the coalition forces. Bans don't work. Why? Because criminals don't obey laws. When DC banned guns, crime involving guns skyrocketed. The ban didn't work. Why? Because criminals don't obey laws. That's precisely why they are "criminals".

Comment_arrow

steve forte

11:21 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

so 600 gun deaths per week. Of them 337 per yr are from assault weapons ( roughly 1.2 % ) So we are going to fix the problem banning assault weapons? What about the other 98.8 %?

Rick Watrous

7:05 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

Kudos to President Obama for putting forth these measures. Now if only Congress will do some work to pass this overdue legislation into law.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Dennis Karoleski

8:20 am on Friday, January 18, 2013

The whole “semiautomatic assault rifle” ban foolishness that was and still is being perpetuated on a firearm ignorant and gullible public is based on a ridicules lie. Actual assault rifles are selective fire, class III weapons that can fire fully automatically. I realize the “ignorant and proud of it” claim this doesn’t matter, as they are satisfied with “expert” opinions fed them by politicians and actors. They are happy if it just looks like a scary “assault weapon” and has, like the new NY “assault rifle” ban stipulates, at least one “military weapon” feature. Things like pistol grips, magazines holding more than ten rounds or bayonet lugs. Interestingly enough, the older and expired as ineffective “assault rifle” ban stipulated they have at least two of the hated accessories. That at least prevented the ridicules inclusion of most semiautomatic deer rifles, modern design muzzle loaders, 1880 design lever rifles in pistol calibers and even 1770 era flintlock muskets off the banned lists. I suppose the politicians who came up with this nonsense count on the ignorance of firearms that is epidemic in the city-dwelling general population. After all, a population who could be conditioned to tolerate them passing bills before they have been read is probably dumb enough to believe anything they spew as gospel.

Peter Downs

7:05 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

He didn't do one thing to stop anyone with any type of a gun entering a school or a shopping center. What needs to be done is to enforce/create stricter penalties for any crime committed with a firearm. All of the criminals just breathed a sigh of relief, because they are still not affected. Only law abiding citizens are. The whole thing was sad. Very sad, that what was put forth today was the best our President could come up with. Sad that he paraded children in his agenda too.

Reply

Watts

7:05 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

No idea why the author would put the word consensus in quotation marks, as if to imply that it was debatable. Obama is doing what the majority of Americans want, which is why he was voted in again.

Pew Poll: http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2013/01/14/poll-gun-control-that-americans-support/

ABC/Washington Post Poll: http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/obama-says-hell-offer-plans-to-stem-gun-violence-this-week/2013/01/14/b7ad8ea8-5e6c-11e2-90a0-73c8343c6d61_story.html

I would say that with poll figures that strong in support of what he is proposing, that he rightfully would call that a consensus of Americans.

Reply

Proud Conservative

7:05 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

Are any of you anti-gun nuts willing to put a "Gun Free House" sign up on your front lawn?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Reality Geezer

11:21 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

My sign would read---"This home is gun free, except when gun nuts are visiting, guess which day that will be."..

Nancy P

7:05 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

Oh really Jan? And when was that exactly?

Reply

Bob Gibbs

7:38 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

Is anyone looking at the amount of privacy that is being sacrificed. Essentially all your info, including medical records and your or your childs conversation with a doctor, now all on one big government database.

# 2 You sign away your right to privacy whenever you sign the HIPA form. Have you ever read it.

# 16 Doctors getting government permission to spy on you.

# 16, 20, 21, 22 More OBAMACARE updates. See. We really don't know what is it this this, because it can change at anytime.

All the new locks and safes, Well, there are 2 industries that will be growing.

So much of these 23 EOs are fluff. Ex. nominate an ATF director. Part of YOUR responsibility Mr. President!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Michael Cole

11:21 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

I absolutely agree with Bob G.(who by they way is/or was a great Yogi), and would love to hear from mental health providers as to how they feel about those E.O.s. To me, they further blur the line between patient-physician confidentiality and mandated reporting, and may impose liability on those mental health providers if they don't report on their patients.
AND LETS BE REAL HERE,regardless of hind-sight speculation that smaller magazines and the elimination of certain "military style" plastic features would have saved lives, the clear agenda is to capitalize on the horrible tragedy at Sandy Hook to take another incremental step in prohibiting private ownership of firearms.

mike

11:21 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

He should be impeached... Getting the obamacare passed was illegal... Now he want to take away are rights.... Rule one for starting a dictatorship take away there guns...

Reply

Reality Geezer

11:21 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

I suspect most gun owners do not even belong to the NRA. Their only function is to promote the gun manufacturers and make "profits" for them. There is no reason to punish a hunter with a shotgun, but there is need to get military style weapons off the streets. Gun owners need to be held legally responsible for their deadly weapons. It is about time this happens......

Reply
Comment_arrow

Apljak

2:18 pm on Thursday, January 17, 2013

It's funny that the left argues in favor of corrupt unions yet they want to try and make a similar argument about the NRA.
The NRA is protecting the 2nd Amendment against the progressive and continued legislation and usurping of our rights.
It is a little known fact that the NRA was started to help protect against lynchings and can be credited with helping the blacks protect themselves against the KKK.
Gun owners should be, and most are, responsible for all of their guns.
What would actually be best would be to enforce the laws on the books instead of these idiot liberal judges not enforcing mandatory sentences for criminals that use guns while committing crimes!

Comment_arrow

Watts

2:18 pm on Thursday, January 17, 2013

I ow a gun, but I would never join the NRA. First of all, their agenda is not for gun owners, it is for gun manufacturers. They lobby with one agenda; optimizing the flow for consumption. They love these fights and wave after wave of social paranoia that "government is coming for your guns," which sends most moronic of our society out in hordes to buy more guns. Does anybody really think that the NRA cares about the 2nd amendment? They care about the bottom dollar for manufacturers and keeping the flow to market as obstacle free for them as possible.

steve forte

2:18 pm on Thursday, January 17, 2013

Why is there a need to get " military style weapons off the streets" ? They account for less then 1.5 % of gun deaths. What we need is to keep criminals and fruitloops from getting guns.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mike Healey

3:15 pm on Thursday, January 17, 2013

Do you consider yourself to be a "fruitloop"?

ken surs

2:18 pm on Thursday, January 17, 2013

Lets all look at the problem how many are on death role straining the countrys taxes.Allowing early release of sex offenders and lessor assualt crimes do to over population of prisons.Lesser time for murders and more time for crimes that are not violent.Its time to quite being passive againest violent crimes and become violent upon people commiting crimes.No more appeals for the criminals caught with the smoking gun knife club or what ever used to commit againest a law abiding people.We need to not keep thoses criminals in jail they need to go from courtroom to the deathchamber.Things will not change unless we change in how theses violent criminals are handle.More gun laws wont work we need to put more citizens on the street with many hours of training learning everyone to handle a firearm proficently with deadly accuracey.I belive in more training for anyone owening firearms tto defened our kids our schools and malls are homes and all public places.Criminals dont follow the law neither do crazy people so why disarm law abiding citizens who can protect others.We need not to be handleing violent crimes so lightly ,Criminals have no rights so lets stop giving them rights.We

are the only ccountry

Reply

ken surs

2:18 pm on Thursday, January 17, 2013

WE are the only country that is so lientent on violent crimes its time to take the gloves off and show the violent criminals that the only thing they have forward to look for is fact they go to deathchamber as soon as they are found guilty.

Reply
Comment_arrow

steve forte

8:20 am on Friday, January 18, 2013

And that right there is the reason it exists. Do people realize someone who puts off road deisel into an on road use truck faces a stiffer penalty then someone who steals a car.
Someone who gets caught with 3 or 4 joints will get the same penalty as someone who beats someone else with a baseball bat.

steve forte

4:55 pm on Thursday, January 17, 2013

Mike Healey

3:15 pm on Thursday, January 17, 2013

Do you consider yourself to be a "fruitloop"?

No Mike I dont. I dont have fantasies of wasting room fulls of people that I dont know.

Reply

sandy burt

8:20 am on Friday, January 18, 2013

its a no win situation, everyone gets terrified when others are shot like the theater and new tonw as well we should, what if it were one of our kids, brothes, sisters parent that was shot. would we think different and blame the president for doing nothing? i agree people will get guns no matter. but if you have nothing to hide and are not menatally ill why objecy ? ho many more have to die? he isnt taking rifles away from hunters, or guns out of our homes. trying to stop the murders as best he can. feel bad for him either way he cant win. guess its best to do nothing at all and let it continue?

Reply
Comment_arrow

steve forte

8:41 am on Friday, January 18, 2013

A couple things are good ideas. Problem is when these things dont work what do we do next? For some people the obvious answer would be even more gun control. How about maybe crime control?

Scott-NH

8:20 am on Friday, January 18, 2013

When Sandy Hook first happened, my initial thought was, it's time to get rid of these high capacity magazines and limit how many shots they can spew at a time.

Then as time went on and the discussions began [the intelligent ones], I found myself leaning more towards the idea we need to address mental health issues in our society. Instead of spending money on unneeded SRO's and bunkering up the schools, maybe having councilors in schools to help those with developmental issues have an avenue for help and support.

Seems to me, if your a well balanced individual, you see a gun as a tool for hunting or protection, you see video games and movies as mindless entertainment, but to those who these things seem to influence in an unhealthy manner, it;s bovious there is some kind of unbalance.

Do we need guns that can take out an entire room in under 1 minute in the hands of every day people? Or do we need to be looking at our societal influences and how they can trouble those who are susceptible? Both are legitimate parts to the discussion, in my personal opinion.

Reply
Comment_arrow

steve forte

8:41 am on Friday, January 18, 2013

Scott you are absoluty correct. Laws are in place to protect us from sane non criminal people. Unfortunatly the only way to protect ourselves from insane criminal people is to fight back.

Thomas Landry

8:58 am on Tuesday, January 22, 2013

It has already been admitted by VP Biden himself the current gun laws in place meant to keep guns out of the criminals hands have not even upheld by our government due to the lack of funding and manpower to do so. We should give control of gun regulations over to the same federal government who's at fault for the system we have now not working. If they can't handle the simple measures in place now thinking we can trust them to handle an even more complex and costly system is asinine. Not too mention all that extra effort would be for a solution that facts show doesn't make any significant difference. We don't need another fix on paper we need violence control solutions that we can institute now that will be effective, easy, and not infringe on our rights.

Reply

Charles McDuffee

9:53 am on Tuesday, January 22, 2013

@ Scott_NH And one of the questions for the certification exam to see if you are capable of getting a gun should be, will you ever need a 30 round magazine? If the answer comes back yes that should count against you!

Reply

Charles McDuffee

9:53 am on Tuesday, January 22, 2013

@ R. Scott Wright Your point on gun deaths is correct. It's not the NRA membership, or winning an argument, or hurting hunters/sportsmen, it's limiting the numbers of deaths people. Well over 1k since Sandy Hook.

Reply

JIM

9:11 am on Saturday, January 26, 2013

obamas ''gun control measures'' like the rest of his pushed through legislation will do nothing to fix the problem of CRIMINAL gun violence while spending billions of the American taxpayers dollars on ''feel good legislation'', its business as usual in WISHington

Reply

Leave a comment