patching...
Breaking: Vehicle Flips on I-93 Exit 1 Off Ramp »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Morse on Gaming: 'Things Have Changed in Concord'

The state senator spoke at the Greater Salem Chamber of Commerce meeting on Friday.

 

Just hours before a massive blizzard slammed the state of New Hampshire, a group of about 50 residents crowded into Atkinson Country Club to receive a much more optimistic forecast on the climate of expanded gaming in the state.

State Sens. Chuck Morse (R-Salem) and Jim Rausch (R-Derry) met with members of the Greater Salem Chamber of Commerce on Friday as part of its "Concord Connections" series to give a prognosis on the nature of a casino bill currently churning its way through Concord.

"There is no doubt things have changed in Concord," Morse said. "The atmosphere is much different about gaming. It's not about will we pass gaming. It's about how will New Hampshire do it right."

Morse was confident that the N.H. Senate will support expanded gaming legislation, saying that the challenge will go to the House.

On the details of the bill, Morse was vague given that the legislation is still being crafted.

He did explain that Gov. Maggie Hassan wants one, well-regulated casino in southern N.H.

The reality is that if passed, the legislation would put the casino license out to bid.

"We're going to raise $80 million on that license," Morse said. "That 80 million will be in the budget for 2014-2015."

Morse did break down where he wants some of the revenues to split toward, explaining that he believes that 45 percent of the money from gaming should go toward higher education.

Another 45 percent Morse wants to go to the state's infrastructure, such as bridges, roads and the ongoing work on Interstate 93.

Morse wants the final 10 percent to go toward technological development in the north country.

Rausch spoke to some of the infrastructure shortfalls, saying that money received from gaming will "easily support" the highway bonds, which total $445 million with a principal in interest payment between $30 million and $35 million.

"But there are more critical needs in the state," he said, referencing Betterment funds that go directly to local communities.

"Those are for local roads, not state roads," he said. "That is a direct result to the population of those communities to reduce property taxes."

Rausch said that gaming would help solve problems of red-listed bridges "significantly."

Revenues that would go to the host community and surrounding towns were also addressed.

Morse said that 3 percent would go to the town that houses the casino. If it were to be Salem, the towns of Windham, Atkinson and Derry would all share in 1 percent of the revenues.

He added that dollars in the bill go directly toward the treatment of gambling addictions.

The casino license would only be good for 10 years.

Hassan will unveil her state budget in a joint meeting of the House and Senate at 10 a.m. on Thursday.

Related Topics: Casino, Expanded Gaming, Gambling, and Gaming

Tom Linehan

7:34 am on Monday, February 11, 2013

I like Chuck and Jim. I have supported Chuck for many years. I do not doubt Chuck's sincerity or his initial numbers. But I do doubt that they will hold over time. Politicians will spend every new dollar and then some. And when the money eventually begins to dry up, they will be slow to cut back and the usual rabble will call for broad based taxes to make up the shortfall. I am not saying don't do this. What I am saying is if we do, go into it with our eyes wide open.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Scott-NH

9:38 am on Monday, February 11, 2013

Wouldn't it already be safe to assume that the monies from a future casino have already been spent?!? They've already eyeballed where they want it to go and what they want it to do. With education funding and the highway setbacks that are constantly increasing in cost, I have doubts a casino and it's revenues alone are going to suddenly fill up a bare cabinet. I think it has a positive economic impact on the area, both in terms of jobs and further commercial development that will lead to more local tax revenues, but It's no silver bullet when you look at the states big picture issues.

Also, don't get me wrong, the idea of a casino is something I rather the enjoy the idea of, as long as it's a venue that will bring all sorts of entertainment value beyond rolling the dice and pulling that lever! From what I've seen of the Meadows, it's a simple middle of the road, no muss-no fuss, nothing to talk about atmosphere.

Patch_comments_icon

Dan Tuohy

10:25 am on Monday, February 11, 2013

In related news, the chair of the House Finance Committee (Mary Jane Wallner) said on The Exchange show this a.m. that the House is unlikely to pass a gambling bill.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Underwater Couple

5:40 pm on Monday, February 11, 2013

Republicans have always delivered on this matter. Democrats are interested in spending and dubious bills like protecting sex offenders.

Comment_arrow

Love NH

11:19 am on Tuesday, February 12, 2013

Underwater Couple, what are you talking about? It was the previous republican Governor that blocked expanded gambling in NH. It is the majority of Salem republican state reps that oppose gambling at the rock. It's only since Democrat Maggie Hassan was elected that we are considering this again. Do you even read what you type?

E. Perrault

3:45 pm on Monday, February 11, 2013

We need assurances that more than gambling will be brought into the Rock. Entertainment and nice restraunts are a necessity. I also think Salem should get a cut of that license fee. And the education fund are they going to lower our school budget part if our taxes or just give out more raises to certain groups within?

Reply

Tom Linehan

7:21 am on Tuesday, February 12, 2013

@E. Perrault, The proposal did include restaurants as well as the continuation of the existing charity gambling. The current lottery goes into K-12. This proposal goes into the University system in part.

Reply

Leave a comment