patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Jill Biden in Concord, Laconia, North Country on Friday

Vice President Joe Biden will be in New Hampshire on Monday.

 

Vice President Joe Biden will travel to New Hampshire for a campaign event on Monday, Oct. 29, according to the Obama campaign.

The campaign had announced yesterday that Biden's wife, Dr. Jill Biden, will be in New Hampshire on Friday, Oct. 26. 

Jill Biden will make campaign stops at field offices around the state. She'll be in Concord at 11:10 a.m.; Berlin at 1:40 p.m.; Conway at 3:45 p.m.; and Laconia at 6 p.m. 

President Obama is also scheduled to make a stop in Nashua on Saturday, Oct. 27, his sixth visit to New Hampshire this year.

Additional details will be forthcoming, but the back-to-back visits underscore the heated battle for New Hampshire's four electoral college votes. Polls continue to show it a close race in the Granite State.

Related Topics: Barack Obama, Elections, Jill Biden, and election 2012

Comment_arrow

Atlant Schmidt

11:49 am on Tuesday, October 23, 2012

It's a shame you're so uninformed; it's no wonder you're voting for Romney.

Comment_arrow

Watts

1:53 pm on Tuesday, October 23, 2012

Cecilia Brown = Low to no information voter.

Comment_arrow

Watts

2:10 pm on Tuesday, October 23, 2012

Just stating the obvious.

Comment_arrow

Celia Brown

4:21 pm on Tuesday, October 23, 2012

I guess the new gallup and NH polls are having quite the emotional reaction from the moonbat contingency.

Comment_arrow

Colter95

1:48 pm on Saturday, October 27, 2012

Will Jill think she is in Nevada? Is Joe lost?

C Barry

11:44 am on Tuesday, October 23, 2012

Enough of the democrat barbarian invasions.

Reply

Jim Class

2:07 pm on Tuesday, October 23, 2012

I am so sick of the "Dr. Jill Biden" crap. She holds a Doctorate in Education. It's not like she's cured cancer (or anything else life saving).

Mitt Romney earned a JD (i.e., Juris Doctor), but you don't see him being addressed as "Doctor."

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jan Schmidt

7:30 pm on Tuesday, October 23, 2012

"Except in an academic setting, lawyers are usually addressed as Mr., Mrs., Miss, or Ms. rather than as Dr. Some lawyers style themselves "Esq." (esquire) and prefer that written communications be addressed to them that way. "

Romney seems to prefer Gov.

Comment_arrow

Monique Greilich

7:20 am on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

I have never met a lawyer who was addressed as " Doctor". Have you?

Comment_arrow

David Pittelli

7:43 am on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

I have never met a lawyer who was addressed as "Doctor" either, apart from law professors, and even then, not in a social context. I have met a few blowhards with EdDs who socially go by "Doctor" though. In fact, they seem more apt to do this than are people with PhDs in more prestigious subjects. I agree with JC that Ms. Biden's use of the term here is pretty silly.

Comment_arrow

Jan Schmidt

8:35 am on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

Jim, it's up to the person what they prefer to be called.

If you earned a doctorate, you might choose to be identified by it especially if its important to you. Why are you so offended by it?

Comment_arrow

Jim Class

8:53 am on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

Jan

As a matter of fact, I earned a JD as well, but have never, in the 2 decades I've held it, been called (nor requested to be caller ) doctor. The pretentiousness of it all is what I find offensive. The title of doctor should be reserved for the medical field.

Plus she's not coming here in an academic setting, she's coming here to pander for votes so that her husband might keep his job.

Comment_arrow

Jan Schmidt

9:14 am on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

Well good for you and whoopsie doooo!

Jim Class esq.

A doctorate is earned, if you choose to use it it is your decision. And why do you think a visit from the wife of the VP is "pandering"? When the other side has had people visit here constantly! It's part of the political process we've developed - painful as it can be.

Comment_arrow

Celia Brown

10:52 am on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

Big bird may draw larger crowds than Jill or Sandra Fluke at this point....

Comment_arrow

oldcatlady

10:49 am on Thursday, October 25, 2012

Good for you Jan for not being threatened by someone else's achievements. Too bad that others are not like-minded. If you've done the time and earned the doctorate, you deserve to be called Dr if you so wish. People don't think twice about calling a scientist by Dr. The best teacher my son ever had was a Dr and that's what everyone called her and the extra years of education made a world of difference.

Comment_arrow

Watts

3:31 pm on Tuesday, October 23, 2012

Don't worry, Biden will be an even better president, when he runs for that in 2016!

Comment_arrow

Seamus Carty

7:37 am on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

"Biden will be an even better president, when he runs for that in 2016!"

No matter what happens in 2012, it would be great to have Joe as the Democrat candidate in 2016.

Celia Brown

4:21 pm on Tuesday, October 23, 2012

I've actually seen Biden give a few speeches in my day. He's actually very engaging as a speaker. And you can't deny the energy he has for who he perceives is protecting the middle class. And people should respect him for it. And as I understand he has one son in the military. More than I can say about Mitt.....

Too bad his gaffes and tirades overshadow the good things about Joe. While I disagree with him ideologically, I can see him as a person that I can approach when compromise is required in the legislative branch.

Putting his wife up for this though? no body really knows her. Heck Sandra Fluke is more well known than her..haha

Putting Big Bird on the podium would get more traction...Just based on being recognized

Reply
Comment_arrow

David Pittelli

10:34 pm on Tuesday, October 23, 2012

Hillary is not campaigning because she believes that the Secretary of State, as the representative of the United States to the rest of the world, should not lower him or herself to campaigning. I believe that this is an old tradition, not some excuse whipped up by Ms. Clinton, but I would be happy to stand corrected if anyone has information about past SOS's campaigning for their President.

Comment_arrow

Celia Brown

10:47 am on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

I'd lay low too if I had presidential aspirations. She's smart by steering clear out of all Obama's miscues. You know when the rubber meets the road in this re-election and presidency. One could imagine how much better Hillary would have been. This would have been another landslide election....

Comment_arrow

ForThePeople

10:47 am on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

As representative of foreign policy to other countries, the Secretary of State would not denigrate a potential future president. Foreign policy often survives administrations. Just ask Henry Kissinger.

Comment_arrow

Atlant Schmidt

1:01 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

She's busy; there's work to be one.

As compared to, say, someone like you who blogs here 24x7.

Comment_arrow

Billnh

2:12 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

She's busy figuring out what to do about Libia

Joe

8:21 pm on Tuesday, October 23, 2012

Look out folks! Their sending in a Biden with a brain, although one has to question that, if she is supports Joe Biden. Maybe she's just trying to keep peace in the family; but, down deep you know she supports Paul Ryan!

Reply

Ernest

9:13 pm on Tuesday, October 23, 2012

Jill Biden.......whoopee! That's about as exciting as listening to the temperature fall.

Reply

Holly Smith

9:11 am on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

Kind of sad when spam gives you better information than the trolling Neocon majority on this site.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Monique Greilich

10:03 am on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

Sadly, I have to agree. Too bad we have to deal with snide remarks instead of real dialogue.

Comment_arrow

Seamus Carty

10:20 am on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

"Neocon"? How does namecalling add to the dialogue?

Comment_arrow

Jan Schmidt

11:22 am on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

Seamus, you've been told this before... By me... Several times...

Neo-con is a short form of neo (meaning new) and con (conservative)

It isn't name calling, it's is what it is - the new group who call themselves conservatives. Not conservative like my mom, not even conservative like Reagan... Think Rove and you have the idea. Those who manipulate, buy, lie...

Comment_arrow

Joe

12:59 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

@Jan - It isn't name calling, it's is what it is - the new group who call themselves liberals. Not liberal like my mom, not even liberal like John F. Kennedy... Think Karl Marx and you have the idea. Those who manipulate, buy, lie...

Comment_arrow

David Pittelli

1:20 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

Holly & Jan,
While by derivation it might appear that "neoconservative" means any new-style or present-day conservative, using it that way is historically ignorant and ignores that the commenters here who are conservative are as likely to be paleoconservatives or social conservatives or libertarian conservatives. Rather than resort to short-hand terms which add nothing to the discussion and which you don't understand how to use, why not state clearly exactly what it is you are objecting to in the other side's premises, arguments or ideology? Your failure to do so makes people think you have nothing intelligent to say, and I'm sure that's not true.

Comment_arrow

Seamus Carty

7:11 am on Thursday, October 25, 2012

It is a slur. The connection is to neo-nazi.
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=neo-con

You can repeat your justification all you want, Jan, but that does not make it so. And you get upset when people use "Democrat Party" instead of "Democratic Party"...

Comment_arrow

David Pittelli

1:23 pm on Thursday, October 25, 2012

Seaums, the Urban Dictionary is not the place to find a reasonable definition for a loaded political term. "Neocon" is not necessarily a slur, although people on the left have attempted to make it and use it as one, at least since the start of the 2nd Iraq War. The term generally referred to intellectuals who were liberal (or even leftist) in the 1960s, but then became more conservative or moved to the Republican Party as Democrats became more dovish in the face of the Soviet Union and communism. The term also had connotations of probably being Jewish. So the point of the anti-Iraq War protesters, when they shouted "no neocon war" was in many cases to say that Jews were behind getting Bush II to agree to Iraq II, because of their primary alliance to Israel. So this use was a slur; but since there have been and are people who call themselves neoconservative, it isn't necessarily so.

Ernest

11:08 am on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

Romney up 50 - 48 in New Hampshire; Romney up by 4 for second consecutive day in nationwide Rasmussen poll. It's all over libs. The Obama Smoke & Mirrors Show is being run out of town. The Chicago con artist is finished!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Atlant Schmidt

2:51 pm on Thursday, October 25, 2012

Unfortunately for your side, President Obama is up in most national polls.

Those other polls must not have arrived in your daily (hourly?) E-mail from Command and Control, huh?

Celia Brown

12:23 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

let's see if the Bengazi emails, proving that the White House lied when it claimed ti was unaware of the root cause of the attacks, gets a fair shake in the media. This is truly damming evidence for Obama. Not much could be worse for this guy. He's run out of people to pay off to buy this election.....with your money even

Reply

Celia Brown

12:28 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

The Obama NH firewall is melting. Don't be surprised if Obama supporters are lined up at the Hooksett tolls handing you 4 quarters before this weekend. After Sunday the footsoliders will leave and all convene in Ohio, where the election will be truly won or lost.... Virginia is toast. Florida is toast. Colorado is toast, And in a few days NH will fall in line. Iowa is dead even as well as Wisconsin.....the chess pieces are moving. It is truly a war out there......

Reply

News Flash

12:47 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

NH +2 for Romney
VA +3 for Romney
FL +5 for Romney
CO +4 for Romney

Swing states are moving to Romney

Reply

Atlant Schmidt

1:00 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

Happily, Nate Silver's "538 Blog" still shows President Obama with a 68.1% chance of winning the election.

He also states that there is a 66.6% chance of President Obama winning New Hampshire.

http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/

Reply
Comment_arrow

David Pittelli

1:23 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

And happily, he is open about the fact that he and his partner will vote for Obama. We'll see soon who is making wishful predictions.

Comment_arrow

Ernest

7:44 am on Thursday, October 25, 2012

Nate Silver??? I'll bet you put a lot of faith in Punxsutawney Phil too.

Comment_arrow

Atlant Schmidt

8:59 am on Thursday, October 25, 2012

David:

Non-sequitur. Everybody (except the truly apathetic) votes for somebody. Even people on Faux Noise.

Comment_arrow

David Pittelli

1:27 pm on Thursday, October 25, 2012

Atlant,
Who's using the non sequitur? There are polling firms where the two partners are of the opposite party, and there are polling firms where the principles keep their politics to themselves; no doubt some are independents, and some may not vote out of a sense of professionalism, not apathy. (It wasn't that long ago that many political reporters did not vote.)

Ernest

7:50 am on Thursday, October 25, 2012

There's nothing Obama can say or do that will win this election for him. The whole country is turning against him and as I've predicted many times by November 6th Romney will be in a great position to win by at least 5%.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Atlant Schmidt

8:58 am on Thursday, October 25, 2012

In your dreams, DUMP, in your dreams.

So how much have you bet on Romney on Intrade? Surely you can't pass up this opportunity to make a killing: Romney shares are priced at $4.17 right now so you could more-than-double your money.

Comment_arrow

David Pittelli

8:55 am on Saturday, October 27, 2012

Here's an interesting article: "Part I: Obama optimism: why it is unfounded"
http://www.bobkrumm.com/blog/?p=2456

Colter95

1:52 pm on Saturday, October 27, 2012

Consider these facts before you vote:
1. Is the economy better off now than it was four years ago? Based on the evidence, I'd have to say no. Wages are down, the the prices of everything we buy is up. The price of gas has doubled. Good jobs are scarce.
2. Are the slight "up tics" in the economy a solid trend in the right direction? I don't think so. First, the gains are very slight. Second, I believe they are the result in the temporary stimulus by the Federal Reserve, in which they printed a lot of new money. It provides a slight bump now, but the cost will come later - after the election. Ben Bernanke is trying to save Obama's job, along with his own.
3. The continual misrepresentation of Romney on the auto bailout by the Obama administration. Obama appears to be taking complete credit for the bailout, while simultaneously saying that Romney was for liquidation of the auto industry. This is an absolute falsehood. It was Bush who initiated the bailout and TARP. Obama continued it and then expanded it, to his credit. However, Romney was one of the first to say that the industry needed to go through bankruptcy reorganization, and eventually they did exactly that. He also said that any needed loans should come from the private sector. He never said that the industry should be liquidated, or that he would deny federal funds if he were president, and private sector funds were not available. Obama lies!
4. The Benghazi coverup and lies.

Reply

yousheng990

4:28 am on Tuesday, December 4, 2012

http://beatsbydrecheap3.weebly.com/ The main competitor brands of the Beats By Dre headphones are industry
leaders such as Bose and Sennheiser, so you know these bad boys have
really been put through a lot of testing and development to match the
criteria. I honestly couldn't see Dr. Dre putting his name on a
studio product that wouldn't live up to his own high quality standards.

Reply

Leave a comment